A beacon of light in an otherwise cloudy community. If you don't want to see opinionated content, please click your browser's back button.
I told myself I wasn't going to make this post. Let the community figure it out, let Blizzard respond, we'll all be friends again. I believe it's more important though, on the day Darkmoon Faire launches, that someone joins the conversation as a partial devil's advocate. I want our readers to know that for the most part, we agree with the general consensus, this is bad.
There has been so much negativity, justified of course, in the Hearthstone community lately thanks to the information we datamined for the experience requirements of the new rewards track. I have zero regrets doing so, it is so important that everyone stays informed and I'm thrilled that we can be that service for the community. Through math, it has been discovered that players, in general, are going to be earning less gold than the old system which is a really shit way to jump into a new set.
Before we continue, I've got a bunch of links that need to be shared. Many community members have also spoken about this topic and like every single member of the community, their voices are important too. I'm just the weird uncle with a front-page exposed to the community.
- Dekkster: We need to talk about the Tavern Pass... (YouTube)
- J_Alexander: Hearthstone's New Progression System Doesn't Meet Expectations
- Solem: Blizzard Lied about the Tavern Pass.. (YouTube)
- RegisKillbin: Let's have a little chat about the battlepass cons ...and pros? (YouTube)
- RidiculousHat: Why Hearthstone players are so angry about the new season pass and what Blizzard can do to fix it (PCGamer)
- Zeddy: Blizzard has LIED to all of us about the Battle Pass and this is NOT OK! (YouTube)
With that out of the way, let's begin.
Sidenote: As this was being written, Hearthstone's Ben Lee has responded to the Rewards Track feedback. We will touch upon that too.
The Rewards Track
For those that aren't familiar with the new system (as I've seen confusion about how it works), the Rewards Track is Hearthstone's new progression system and it has replaced the original goal of daily quests.
The new system is much more fascinating than simply logging in, getting a quest, and exchanging your time completing the said quest for some gold. Now in addition to the gold rewards, we are able to earn card packs, heroes (provided you pay to upgrade), a cosmetic coin (paid), and experience boosts to increase the speed at which you progress. Never has there been so many rewards to earn by just playing Hearthstone.
That's the big key in this whole system, the reason why it was so important to add to the game. You see, Hearthstone isn't just playing ranked Standard and Wild anymore. The game has evolved and is continuing to evolve to support new modes, ways to change up how you'll play and the original system sucked at giving everyone rewards for gameplay. With this new system, experience is rewarded for Arena, Battlegrounds, and Duels too, which means those types of players can work their way towards new rewards. A huge win if you're trying to get new people to play the game and they aren't very interested in the core gameplay.
How Blizzard Goofed
I have one big problem with all the math that is being done and we're on the hook for this too, sort of. None of the math considers what we'll earn from participating in legendary quests that are active during events. Now, here's where the "sort of" comes into play because I don't fault anyone for it. Blizzard, you goofed hard.
It isn't that the system in itself is difficult to understand, a common complaint I've seen. Most online games these days have a battle pass and they all work the same way:
- Complete objective
- Earn experience
- Level up and earn a reward
Yes, it is more "complicated" than the old system of "get daily get gold", but that system was boring. Being stuck with something for 6 years doesn't make it good, that's just a bad relationship if you feel that way.
We're just playing Fortnite!
Had Blizzard provided us with a better picture of how the entire pass was laid out and a breakdown of what we would be able to use for experience gains, we'd be able to have the full picture now. Just tell us how much a legendary quest is going to give us and how many you're planning on distributing. Pushing players into the system blind gets everyone angry and they start cancelling their pre-orders. Blizzard, remember that blog that you used to sometimes use for posting cool developer updates? This is a great space for information like that!
The interface for the new system of progression and achievements is horrendous.
- By trying to keep things so simple, everything has become a nested mess in the Hearthstone client.
- By trying to keep things so simple, we've got a bunch of meaningless icons that are useless for a player new to the system.
- Collection Manager scrolling from an older patch uses the wrong scroll wheel direction. (That's an article for another time).
Labels are good. The icons on the left, not so much. Was a tooltip too hard for desktop at least?
I don't understand what happened at the Hearthstone team in the past year or two as far as their user interface and experience team goes, but this is getting out of hand. We see the same trend of having nothing labelled extended into the new "Modes" tab where you can't tell the difference between Arena, Battlegrounds, and Duels until you click on them all and eventually learn the icons. Why are people so afraid of text?
I'm starting to feel like the reason we couldn't have more deck slots for a while was that the team themselves couldn't find a way to make the entire thing out of icons without text. At least they got the scroll wheel direction correct on that feature.
The third gaff is that the reward track's Tavern Pass component (way to go on reusing the name from Battlegrounds because that isn't confusing) should have been included in the mega pre-order bundle. I know Bobby Kotick has to buy a new sports car and mansion, but surely there has to be a better way to go about this.
The game gets more expensive twice with this expansion. Although I don't agree completely with the community on this one because we still don't have the full breakdown of the cards to come in the 35-card set addition, it is additional cards we need to acquire which ultimately is more money (amount pending). I don't mind spending money on the game, but this is another place where some transparency would be nice since you're doing something weird. We knew Galakrond's Awakening was going to cost what you'd expect out of an Adventure, is the same true here? More expensive? Cheaper?
The Tavern Pass though is absolutely a requirement for playing, or at least should be more than just a bunch of cosmetic heroes.
The paid version of the pass is the literal Barrens in World of Warcraft. Occasionally there is a town or a dead wife to find, but the rest is just empty. Make it more interesting by moving a handful of packs from the bundle into the initial pass, giving better rewards to players who don't buy the bundle but opt instead for the pass, that'd be neat. It also wouldn't take more than a couple of games to unlock the few packs, so it isn't a big hurdle.
There you go, another free blog topic. Talk about why the paid pass is the way it is.
Blizzard, You Can Do Better
This really isn't rocket science. No seriously, you weren't responsible for yesterday's SpaceX ISS docking, this is just a children's card game (CCG). Obviously, there are many different teams and responsibilities of the Hearthstone team, but it sounds like you need a new person or team to keep things in check with your player base.
- Detail your new progression mode. Absolutely unacceptable everyone was left in the dark.
- Detail the amount of XP per hour for every mode, not just a select few.
- Tell us exact plans for the additional experience gains that aren't a part of the quests and achievements system.
- Figure out what happened to your user experience and interface team. Is the dog on the computer again?
- Communicate. JUST DO IT! Learn from Riot, they know how to communicate with the community.
Also, really? A Year of the Dragon pack as the level 48 reward? Who designed this system? You are more than capable of giving out multiple rewards on each track level, your new system uses the old achievement/quest system internally after all so you can definitely give players multiple rewards (how about gold and that crud pack?) for completing a single objective, you've done it before and your current system supports it.
Update: I should have fact-checked this before going live. I misremembered client data.
We Should Still Enjoy the Expansion
Although Blizzard has dropped the ball here, let's be real though, it's whatever the monetization team is called that we really have a problem with, Darkmoon Faire still looks like plenty of fun and we shouldn't let them ruin the atmosphere.
- Share your favourite decks with your friends and the community.
- Talk about the stuff you love about the new set.
- Give the developers positive feedback on your new favourite cards and decks; Don't turn them into alcoholics.
- Figure out the overpowered stuff and abuse it so we can get dust refunds in 2 weeks. This is why you never disenchant duplicate cards at the start of an expansion.
Remember, we can still enjoy the game while not liking certain aspects of it. Arena and Wild players have been doing exactly that since the beginning of time so find a friend who partakes in those sides of the game and ask them how they cope.
Have a fun expansion launch, don't let Blizzard off the hook, and most importantly:
- If you see people not providing constructive criticism, ask them what they believe would fix things.
- If you see someone attacking developers personally, tell them to take a hike. Be angry at the company and the process, not the individual people.
- If you have a queue lasting more than 4 hours, restart the game.
- Flux
An Update Before Posting
Before this was posted, Ben Lee responded to the rewards track community feedback.
- Your team has still not addressed how much experience we should expect. We're talking numbers now, you should be too.
- "Variety of ways" is the usual Hearthstone vague.
- Its good to see there will be a catch-up mechanism for players who join in late. Why not describe it?
- 1350 Gold being added instead of some poor reward choices near the end of the pass is a damn good change.
I still trust that Blizzard will ensure "players earn more gold and total rewards per expansion" is a reality, because they've been repeating it non-stop and because of that it is their one saving grace with me, but I feel like they could have given us more to chew on than just knowing there's more gold at the end.
Comments
I don't think datamining is overly damaging, though I broadly agree with your final point. Responsible dataminers go to extra lengths to point out that datamining may include abandoned, experimental, or out-of-context data. As long as the information they're presenting is true and accurate to the best of their knowledge (and it usually is), it's up to individuals to form their own opinions on it... with those disclaimers in mind. Sure, because of the "telephone game effect" it's easy for "new Hero art found in latest Hearthstone patch" to morph into "WE'RE GETTING A NEW HERO IN THE NEXT EXPANSION GUARANTEED," but I think that happens regardless of how the information is obtained. A developer's statement gets turned into a promise; a content creator gets access to a sneak peek and drops hints on social media, and people mistake them for solid proof of new content. Every one of us chooses how we react to each event, even if there's uncertainty or misconception around the original data source.
And this is why the majority of the time I preface datamined info with "this may change etc." It is so important to cover your ass when you're going to be the source of something important and you know people are going to mangle it.
But, there are times, such as the XP with the rewards track, when I didn't bother with a disclaimer at the content of it itself because it was easily verifiable as true in the game. I do think some more care could have been taken to address that there were going to be other sources of experience, because it is quite clear people forgot about that, but I don't think in this case it would have calmed any of the rage.
I do love that I still get comments about Celeste. I especially love it when they are in the realm of "that was a bunch of bs". It shows even a proper disclaimer doesn't go very far with people and the general understanding that should exist of "stuff can be in a game client for a long time without a release" clearly doesn't.
I love datamining though and giving everyone insight into what's going on with the game that they aren't telling us about.
Definitely. I wasn't trying to insinuate that you weren't a responsible dataminer! Sorry if it came across that way. I support datamining more from a "ooh, I wonder what that is, let's speculate about it (hopefully in a positive way and have fun)" standpoint than a "shine a flashlight on the stuff they're hiding" one, but both are valid uses.
Agreed about everything. They really need to include cosmetics for achievements too. Like play edwin 100 times and you get a golden edwin or a different colored edwin (same art but now black clothes or something). Same with heroes. Easy way to add new cosmetics. I'd love a different color clothed Valeera just to show off how many wins I have with her, etc.
Achievement points are fine as they don't need to be used for anything other than bragging but they really should have added cosmetics for achievement milestones - card backs, new hero skins, new card skins (like why isn't this a thing yet? i.e. different colored edwin or new art but same card effect), they could even do hero trays, new boards, and even pets like LoR does.
I really like the idea of achievements but I thought we'd actually get some rewards for it versus it being worthless.
oh and the UI is awful
Guess I also forgot to mention that I shouldn’t have to spend $80 and only get 2/3 of a set.
$80 should give you the entire set plus the new tavern pas
$60. It's like a new game every expansion, and new games cost $60. Unless I'm too old and "in my day candy cost a nickle, and we went to school 8 days a week, until they got rid of Redsday because of the war. The important thing to remember is I had an onion tied to my belt, which was the style at the time."
I mean we kind of are. Seriously google "Why do video games still cost 60 dollars?" You'll find tons of articles explaining that despite inflation from the 90's.
https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1994?amount=1
What does this mean? It means that a 60 dollar game from 1994 would actually cost $105 in today's dollars.
Are micro-transactions and some practices by some companies (not just Blizzard) unscrupulous? For sure. I've played my share of money sink games (Star Wars: Galaxy of Heroes I'm looking at you!).
But...gamers are partly to blame. The gaming community, frankly speaking, is an entitled petulant bunch (as a group). I'm sure individually people are respectful, but on reddit, in forums, etc. My interactions I observe don't show that. Gamers have pushed this 60 dollar price tag for so long that I actually believe that companies, instead of just increasing the base cost by 20 dollars, now just want to nickel and dime us to make up the difference. I mean, to be fair, the statistics and research and purchasing patterns have proven that the model works.
There's a lot more going on. Inflation, wage income gap, job payment systems. These all indirectly feed into these models that we see today. Where a 60 dollar game has never increased in price in the last 20+ years, but we still expect the same AAA quality. So the companies instead use microtransactions and the such to make up the difference. C'est la vie.
Smashing job, sir! I hope they listen well to these critiques. The Tavern Pass ABSOLUTELY should be included in the already horrendously overpriced bundle
Honestly, one thing I really don't like about the achievements is how I have to go to the achievement menu (which itself is a mess) and claim the achievement every time I want to earn points from it.
It doesn't even take that long to do, but it's stupid that I have to do it in the first place. Why can't the game just give me the achievement points as soon as I earn the achievement like every other gaming service that has achievements in it? Imagine if every time you earned a PSN Trophy, Xbox achievement, Steam achievement, etc., you had to go to the achievements menu every time to claim the achievement. That'd be stupid and unnecessary, which is precisely why they don't do that. Just give me the achievement points right then and there, and let me move on.
Agreed. Stupid design choice.
They also should have included a description of what you did when you get the popup saying it was earned.
For the archievement thing, I guess it's because some archievement give XP or pack/card so they let us the joy of clicking on the "get the reward button". But the archievement page is so messy that event this is not funny since you have to find it accross a lot of things you don't care. It should directly have a button 'claim" when you open the page for the free stuff and like demonxz say get the archievements directly.
BUT:
I do not agree, I don't want to get spoiled in my game when a popup shows and say "hey, archievement for winning a game" when you are still looking your battleground last epic battle. Maybe it could be ok if the archievement didnt pop until we saw the end of the matches but actually i'd rather get a popup with a text i don't understand.
I wish they would add tracking achievements and quests in game.
like if I play 3/6 weapons for whatever that quest is pop up somewhere and show me the quest or achievement progress
Not the biggest issue, but I just wanted to say what I don't like about the achievements is they spoil the outcome of some games. For example, I go into a match in Battlegrounds and I get an achievement before the match even starts and I already know I lost/won. That completely takes away the excitement.
They also spoil pack openings, since you'll get "Class Collector" achievements and such the moment you open a pack, before hovering over anything.
Not sure how easy those are to fix, though.
Yeah, that is also a big annoyance.
Same. I won a game of Battlegrounds with a 5% chance of lethal in the last round before achievements started exploding on the bottom left corner. I felt like the achievements were the true victory screen instead of the loud 'YAAAAAAY' in the end.
That's a huge oversight that needs correction. I forget what you used to be able to do to see if you won the round before it was over, but I know they patched it out for the same reason. Hopefully that is on their radar.
Glad to see that content creators that plays "for free" and not in a casual way that most of users do are at our side too. Thanks for giving us public voice :)
I love that. Back then there was "variety of ways" to boost our gold income (quests rewarding x2 gold or giving the same amount of dust as addition to the gold...). They won't even come close to that now. I'm done.
Excellent read, Flux. Thanks for this. I feel a lot more informed.