Activision Blizzard CEO, Bobby Kotick, has sent a letter to all employees and it was published to the Activision Blizzard investor relations site. The letter calls the initial response from leadership "tone deaf" and provides insight into the path going forward for the company.
We have the full letter down below, but here is a recap of the important points:
- The initial response to the issues at the company was tone deaf.
- Bobby apologizes for the company no providing "the right empathy and understanding".
- WilmerHale, a law firm, will be conducting a review of Activison Blizzard policies and procedures to "maintain best practices to promote a respectful and inclusive workplace".
- Effective Immediately:
- Employee Support. They will continue to investigate each and every claim and will not hesitate to take decisive action.
- Listening Sessions. They will be creating safe spaces, moderated by third parties, for you to speak out and share areas for improvement.
- Personnel Changes. They are immediately evaluating managers and leaders across the Company. Those found to be impeding the integrity of processes will be terminated.
- Hiring Practices. They will be adding compliance resources to ensure that our hiring managers are in fact adhering to this directive.
- In-game Changes. Removing content that players and employees find inappropriate.
Quote From Bobby Kotick A Letter From CEO Bobby Kotick to All Employees
July 28, 2021
SANTA MONICA, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Jul. 27, 2021– Activision Blizzard, Inc. (Nasdaq: ATVI) CEO Bobby Kotick today sent the following letter
to all employees.July 27, 2021
This has been a difficult and upsetting week.
I want to recognize and thank all those who have come forward in the past and in recent days. I so appreciate your courage. Every voice matters - and we will do a better job of listening now, and in the future.
Our initial responses to the issues we face together, and to your concerns, were, quite frankly, tone deaf.
It is imperative that we acknowledge all perspectives and experiences and respect the feelings of those who have been mistreated in any way. I am sorry that we did not provide the right empathy and understanding.
Many of you have told us that active outreach comes from caring so deeply for the Company. That so many people have reached out and shared thoughts, suggestions, and highlighted opportunities for improvement is a powerful reflection of how you care for our communities of colleagues and players – and for each other. Ensuring that we have a safe and welcoming work environment is my highest priority. The leadership team has heard you loud and clear.
We are taking swift action to be the compassionate, caring company you came to work for and to ensure a safe environment. There is no place anywhere at our Company for discrimination, harassment, or unequal treatment of any kind.
We will do everything possible to make sure that together, we improve and build the kind of inclusive workplace that is essential to foster creativity and inspiration.
I have asked the law firm WilmerHale to conduct a review of our policies and procedures to ensure that we have and maintain best practices to promote a respectful and inclusive workplace. This work will begin immediately. The WilmerHale team will be led by Stephanie Avakian, who is a member of the management team at WilmerHale and was most recently the Director of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement.
We encourage anyone with an experience you believe violates our policies or in any way made you uncomfortable in the workplace to use any of our many existing channels for reporting or to reach out to Stephanie. She and her team at WilmerHale will be available to speak with you on a confidential basis and can be reached at [email protected] or 202-247-2725. Your outreach will be kept confidential. Of course, NO retaliation will be tolerated.
We are committed to long-lasting change. Effective immediately, we will be taking the following actions:
1. Employee Support. We will continue to investigate each and every claim and will not hesitate to take decisive action. To strengthen our capabilities in this area we are adding additional senior staff and other resources to both the Compliance team and the Employee Relations team. 2. Listening Sessions. We know many of you have inspired ideas on how to improve our culture. We will be creating safe spaces, moderated by third parties, for you to speak out and share areas for improvement. 3. Personnel Changes. We are immediately evaluating managers and leaders across the Company. Anyone found to have impeded the integrity of our processes for evaluating claims and imposing appropriate consequences will be terminated. 4. Hiring Practices. Earlier this year I sent an email requiring all hiring managers to ensure they have diverse candidate slates for all open positions. We will be adding compliance resources to ensure that our hiring managers are in fact adhering to this directive. 5. In-game Changes. We have heard the input from employee and player communities that some of our in-game content is inappropriate. We are removing that content.Your well-being remains my priority and I will spare no company resource ensuring that our company has the most welcoming, comfortable, and safe culture possible.
You have my unwavering commitment that we will improve our company together, and we will be the most inspiring, inclusive entertainment company in the world.
Yours sincerely,
Bobby
Comments
There's a difference between getting rid of sexualization ad absurdum to the point of bordering NSFW (as seen with the removal of Succubus and Keeper of Secrets for instance) and the bizarre censoring of something as mild as Lady Anacondra's slight cleavage.
I'm fine with the former when it's part of bringing artwork in line with the family friendly standard of the game. I'm also fine with stuff like the Jaina "nerf" which ultimately ended up looking much better from an aesthetic point of view.
I am very much against ideological censorship by out of touch attention seekers who are so unhappy with themselves that they project their insecurity on everything and achieve absolutely nothing by enforcing their puritanical standards on extremely tame examples of mild fanservice. Fictional women do not need someone to advocate for them. They are not real. If you want to make an argument for realism, that has no place in the larger WoW universe, seeing how even the male characters run around in stupidly elaborate armor while being built like a fridge (but of course the parallel issue of male character being just as unrealistically stylized and/or sexualized as female characters rarely gets brought up).
The fact that those are the only two options you can conceive of is not an indictment of the folks advocating change, but rather demonstrates your lack of imagination or empathy. People advocate for aesthetic changes in videogames for many more reasons than being "out of touch attention seekers who are unhappy with themselves," just as people oppose these changes for more reasons than just being neckbeard incels who send death threats any time a woman appears on their screen with less than double-D cup breasts.
If you don't want to be reduced to that stereotype, maybe try to stop reducing the other side to a stereotype too.
yet you were the one to immediately strawman me as a horny coomer just because I stated that I dislike pointless censorship.
Not to mention, as I've outlined above already, this has nothing to do with the workplace issues meaning that if any form of censorship or revisionism is taking place it would essentially just be leeching off a legitimate issue with real world consequences.
If they aesthetic changes come up on their own, that's fine with me, we can have a conversation about that, but if indeed comes as a direct result of the lawsuit and it's slimy and disingenuous.
You really can't see how objectifying women in the workplace and objectifying women in the product produced by that workplace are directly connected? I really don't think you're arguing in good faith here, because this stuff is pretty blindingly obvious.
Actually it's just you who claims this is the case and you have yet to make an argument for why. That would imply that whenever women in media (fictional women no less) are oversexualized (or just sexualized in general) it would result in workplace issues...but then we should have way more instances of this...which we don't.
I know you'd like to believe that it's all very cleaar so you can justify your own irrational biases but reality doesn't conform to your misguided sense of purity.
We don't have way more workplace sexual harassment issues? Woooow. I didn't realize you had never spoken to a woman before in your life. Good luck, man. You're gonna need it.
You actual disingenuous weasel, I clearly meant in other instances of companies where female characters (fictional character you absolute parody of a human being) are being "objectified" (they aren't real, stop being such an absolute joke of a person) the same extent of workplace harassment would have to take place because according to you, those two things are directly related.
BUt you're clearly not interesting in back up any of your claims, you just like to scream at people how mean they in hopes of someone patting you on the head fo rbeing a good boy.
Good luck convincing anyone of your spineless drivel.
Ah yes, more censorship in games. That will surely protect everyone from harassment.
In-game Changes. Removing content that players and employees find inappropriate.
Jaina's portrait, Secret Keeper, Succubus... here we go again!
Hopefully they will not overdo this. I don't really care about Secret Keeper etc. but if you remove any content someone might find inappropriate this will turn nasty.
I bet that had nothing to do with employees but instead with some markets they want to be on
Let's hope they listen to their employees. Glad he acknowledged the tone deaf original release. It was so reactive and sounded like a "frat boy" had written it as a personal defence.
Don't...don't you dare!
You don't even know what you are talking about... It is less about female armors, and more about racist jokes and stereotypes in wow...
There are several NPC's named after employees who allegedly harrased others. I think they will remove or rename them.
I doubt they'll be removing racial jokes / stereotypes / segregation from Warcraft Universe.
Don't think that has anything to do with this lawsuit.
While it has nothing to do with lawsuit. It has to do with statement in this message. So...
Yeah, good for them to redirect our attention to the crimes of a fantasy world to reduce triggers of their frat boy culture.
You should have been more precise in what you meant with your initial message then. Because the way I read it is following:
"But I want my female elves in Victoria Secrets outfits"
Good for them to actually implementing changes. The question is, is it too late?
Well, if the big changes are going to change things for good, then why not.