Comments

• Aurin777 LV.5

  6 years, 9 months ago

  Deck is missing the New Brann. Also worth running Stitched Tracker.

• Esparanta LV.7

  6 years, 9 months ago

  Note the archetype: It's Spell Hunter. Sure, Spell Hunters don't put any minions in their decks but this is different: It's based on singleton decks, so Reno is a-must for heal. As for Subject 9, it's a supreme card-draw. In short, any minions other than them seem irrelevant to me. Adding more minions will prevent from Rhokdelar activating as early as possible. However, that doesn't mean you aren't welcomed to add these minions, only to fail in the long run.

• ArcticFox LV.7

  6 years, 7 months ago

  Quote From Esparanta

  Note the archetype: It's Spell Hunter. Sure, Spell Hunters don't put any minions in their decks but this is different: It's based on singleton decks, so Reno is a-must for heal. As for Subject 9, it's a supreme card-draw. In short, any minions other than them seem irrelevant to me. Adding more minions will prevent from Rhokdelar activating as early as possible. However, that doesn't mean you aren't welcomed to add these minions, only to fail in the long run.

  This is a cheating spell hunter deck but a true singleton/highlander deck. This is a very interesting hybrid. I too wanted to include Dinotamer Brann but your argument makes sense. I am use to seeing Barnes/old god combo but this is a good mix.

  Thank you for this great hybrid. Thank you.

  (Sorry about the earlier posting error which created a lot of dead space.)

• Esparanta LV.7

  6 years, 7 months ago

  You are welcome and glad you like it.

• Aurin777 LV.5

  6 years, 9 months ago

  I'm aware, but you are running all of two cards that require spells (the weapon and to my side). You are running Subject Nine and Reno, so you're already more likely than not going to get clogged up until the late game where you've drawn more of your deck. Rather than running terrible cards like Lock and Load, I think you are better off running some more high powered minions. I guess what I'm saying is spell hunter in reno fashion isn't a strong concept, so you should just shift this to more of a proper reno.

• Esparanta LV.7

  6 years, 9 months ago

  Quote From Aurin777

  I'm aware, but you are running all of two cards that require spells (the weapon and to my side). You are running Subject Nine and Reno, so you're already more likely than not going to get clogged up until the late game where you've drawn more of your deck.

  Until it's tested, we can't be so sure of it.

  Quote From Aurin777

  Rather than running terrible cards like Lock and Load...

  Hmm... You've no idea, really: In Spell Hunter, it's the best card due to potential of cycling your spells into something more useful, just like Mana Cyclone.

  Quote From Aurin777

  ...I think you are better off running some more high powered minions.

  In this deck, no need to, really. Just test this out and you will see.

  Quote From Aurin777

  I guess what I'm saying is spell hunter in reno fashion isn't a strong concept, so you should just shift this to more of a proper reno.

  That's your decision for Reno Spell Hunter, I respect that. For me, it's worth testing, and I will when new expansion launches. As for proper Reno Hunter decks, I made this deck and this deck, so I know the basics.

• brownhackwtf LV.6

  6 years, 8 months ago

  The whole introduction makes no sense. You can play Spell-Reno Hunter without the new expansion, because you don't play the new Brann. And the new two spells are really good in this deck, but for real: When you write THIS:

  Well, it's known that Uldum expansion is about Highlander decks. Since Hunter is chosen for Highlander archetypes, with revealed cards, I thought: Why not Reno Spell Hunter?

  Everybody now thinks, that you will play the new Brann. :D

• Esparanta LV.7

  6 years, 8 months ago

  Indeed, you are correct. One can play Reno Spell Hunter without new expansion but I don't understand why you want new Brann like Aurin. As for what I wrote for introduction, I intentionally specified for Highlander decks and not new Brann. Uldum expansion, in general, is meant to revive Highlander archetypes. Thus, the introduction makes sense.

   

  I'm sorry that my introduction wasn't clear enough. Thanks for the feedback though, I will be more clear next time. I hope you will test this deck like me and enjoy every single bits of it.

• brownhackwtf LV.6

  6 years, 8 months ago

  Don't get me wrong! I like the whole Highlander Archetype and now I know what you mean. When i look to the new 3 mana spell for Hunter it's clear, that this is for the Highlander decks!

  I will test this deck for sure, because i love Spell Hunter and Reno decks! Maybe i will try out the new Brann, but I think you are right, it will make the deck more inconsistent. Maybe I won't play subject 9, because i didn't craft the card yet.

  Well done and sorry for my "not that friendly" comment.

• Esparanta LV.7

  6 years, 8 months ago

  No no, don't say it like that. I'm open to any critism -be it good or bad or harsh- as long as we respect to each other. As for Subject 9, Flare would be a good substition. As always, if there's anything you wish to know, ask me anytime 😃