clawz161's Avatar

clawz161

The Undying
Joined 07/16/2019 Achieve Points 825 Posts 827

clawz161's Comments

  • As long as people are rewarded for actually commenting and not just clicking links and typing a "." in the thread i think this is a good addition.

  • Just like every other blizzard Activision controversy they will just sweep it under the rug and people will still play. Reddit will soy for the game after a couple weeks and forget all about this when trolden or some other reactionary posts a video about yogg or some dumb shit. I foresaw this coming when this system was announced. Itll be shit, people will complain, actiblizz wont do shit about it. People will forget and move on. Just like them changing the card art for china. Just like them banning casters for no reason just like everything.and I pity you if you thought this wouldn't happen. An orangutan can notice patterns better than this.

  • I would probably put Revolve right above the carousel picture, you used for "Other Attractions" as well, since they go really well together

  • I run two f2p accounts one is level 15 the other is level 16, and from there my progress has hit a brick wall. Nothing i do nets me experience. the quests i have all orbit around playing ranked ladder. Something i HATE doing. And i will not do just because it tells me to. Mostly i have been playing a lot of battlegrounds to get those hero specific achievements. I have gotten a new hero almost every time, and i usually get top 4(sometimes luckier, but never first) so it has been a grind for those as well. I have only had to concede when not getting a new hero once, and i only did it because someone else was playing mister bigglesworth and since that hero is trash, i bought a Vulgar Homunculus and conceded, to brighten their day, hopefully they won, but they probably didn't.

  • This reminds me of the fallout 76 email. Where too many people were asking for refunds because the game was broken, and they ended up turning people down and saying "We're sorry for your poor experience with the game, we don't plan on doing anything about it."

  • So glad i got this card now hahaha

    https://hearthstonesounds.s3.amazonaws.com/DMF_529_D.wav

  • Fingers crossed for this ELITE combo

    In reply to Elite OTK warrior
  • I think it's cool how the art changes three times

    In reply to Cascading Disaster
  • I wish i got Deck of Chaos or Greybough, but the more i think about ETC i have glad to have gotten him. 

  • Meme combo. Reduce gonk and y'shaarj to zero with florist turns, or satyr turns, with this having been played already. play gonk play y'shaarj play shan'do and congrats you did what you can do more easily with two claws instead.

  • I was looking at all of the corrupt cards because i was considering making a Y'Shaarj, the Defiler gonk druid deck, mostly as a meme because it would give you Moontouched Amulet but when i looked at all the corrupt cards(for all classes not just druid) i realized that there weren't a whole lot of them. And what was there wasn't super powerful either. And that's got my noggin joggin. They already said they would release more cards with their DMF "mini expansions" and i think that will include better corrupt cards. because other than memeing with Tickatus why would you play Y'Shaarj, the Defiler right now? Fleethoof Pearltusk isn't worth it on it's own. And mechanics like corrupt only stay for one expansion. i am envisioning some pretty good corrupt cards will NEED to come out or this legendary is bricked. and i don't think they'll brick an old god that easily.

  • definitely these are better in wild, than in standard. in wild there's far better deathrattle minions and synergies for these cards, and (at least until they release more dark moon faire cards) these are just pretty lackluster

  • Quote From MenacingBagel

    If I may ask what exactly is from the swamp? I haven't seen it yet from the few games I've played

    I hadn't heard of it either, but apparently it's "Passive Whenever an enemy dies, raise a 1/1 Bloated Zombie."

    In reply to Advice needed
  • Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From clawz161
    Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From clawz161

    [the game is a buggy mess.] 

     

    This is how it is supposed to work. The condition and reward of Shadowlight Scholar are both part of the battlecry. You destroy a soul fragment, and deal 3 damage. If you do that a second time then you will destroy another soul fragment and deal another 3 damage. If you don't have a soul fragment to destroy, then you won't deal 3 damage. It is the same as casting a shaman spell twice and getting double the overload.

    read the whole thing. Then rethink your comment

    Well then I don't know what to say. Maybe you drew more soul fragments than you remember, or maybe something else happened to your deck. 

    The game might have glitched, but that seems really weird that one card would have double battlecry work but the other card wouldn't.

    The game ended on turn 8, i was absolutely positive i only drew one soul fragment the entire game, because i had full health for most of it, and it's memorable to me when i draw those when at full health.

  • Quote From KANSAS
    Quote From clawz161

    Just lost a my third loss in Duels game mode because the game is a buggy mess. 

     

    Be me, opponent is a paladin with 5 health with ysera, and double lich king on board because he swung with his weapon the turn before then played lich king, and since he had the treasure the double legendaries he has 2 now. 

    It's fine i think, since i have the double battlecries treasure and a Shadowlight Scholar in hand, and since i had previously played a Spirit Jailer and had only drawn ONE of the soul fragments, i figured it would be an easy win. But when i play the Shadowlight Scholar, it only does three damage, not the six it should have done. I end my turn because i can't do shit against 2 lich kings and he plays Anti-Magic Shell instantly BTFO-ing me from a previously one-sided game where i had close to full health(he hit me twice in the face with his treasure weapon).

     

    Nice. Game. Activision.

    This is how it is supposed to work. The condition and reward of Shadowlight Scholar are both part of the battlecry. You destroy a soul fragment, and deal 3 damage. If you do that a second time then you will destroy another soul fragment and deal another 3 damage. If you don't have a soul fragment to destroy, then you won't deal 3 damage. It is the same as casting a shaman spell twice and getting double the overload.

    read the whole thing. Then rethink your comment

  • Just lost a my third loss in Duels game mode because the game is a buggy mess. 

     

    Be me, opponent is a paladin with 5 health with ysera, and double lich king on board because he swung with his weapon the turn before then played lich king, and since he had the treasure the double legendaries he has 2 now. 

    It's fine i think, since i have the double battlecries treasure and a Shadowlight Scholar in hand, and since i had previously played a Spirit Jailer and had only drawn ONE of the soul fragments, i figured it would be an easy win. But when i play the Shadowlight Scholar, it only does three damage, not the six it should have done. I end my turn because i can't do shit against 2 lich kings and he plays Anti-Magic Shell instantly BTFO-ing me from a previously one-sided game where i had close to full health(he hit me twice in the face with his treasure weapon).

     

    Nice. Game. Activision.

  • On one account i got The Nameless One and Idol of Y'Shaarj

     

    And the other i got E.T.C., God of Metal and Cenarion Ward

     

    All pretty useless

  • That deck vs thrall at the end looks like TRASH.

  • Quote From sto650

    Let's suppose you kill Greybough, and his deathrattle attaches to Lucentbark. Lucentbark then dies. I'm 100% sure that the now-dormant Lucentbark is just a normal Lucentbark - when he comes back, he will not still have Greybough attached to him.

    It's one of those, chances are slim but the payoff is high type deals. i'll try to test it on release. People are talking about greybough with hadronox but that sounds pretty terrible to me, since taunt druid of the past summoned way better things that greybough. But with greybough lucentbard druid, every time lucetbark would die there would be a two factor taunt in the way. And that's not even including if you copy a lucentbark that has the buff on it. then the potential for more taunts on death is there.

  • Both mirror entities were off an arcane keysmith btw