FortyDust
LV.14Pumpkin
Comments
1,909 totalQuote From Brandon Edit: okay i don't know much about WoW lore and stuff, but shouldn't this be an Elemental? It seems like one.
Nah, they look somewhat similar, but spirits and shades are a …
Quote From Me0203 This draws the spell from your deck rather than generating another copy of it, yeah?
Yes.
Tools like this one are extremely valuable in combo decks, but they are also good …
[card]Ancient Watcher[/card] is out, but [card]Humongous Razorleaf[/card] is in ... I dunno, seems like we'll need a lot more targets before this becomes good. OK against Frozen, I guess?
[card]Arcane Watcher[/card] has been strong in spell damage decks, but …
It looks like they are leaning into the midrange/tempo Priest idea. I suspect that archetype will receive a fair amount of support in the expansions, so I have to believe this is a 4-star card.
Just gonna put this out there ...
[card]Stand Against Darkness[/card] is in Core.
Quote From Brandon Seems good 2 mana destroy a minion is solid. But it's a paladin secret, so i think it might not see that much play. (unless Paladin gets a big pay-off card for secrets like [card]Mysterious …
Quote From Anathemos I wonder what exactly "inherits these powers" means. I assume it means "gets +2 spell damage & this deathrattle". That is, I assume it doesn't mean "gets all the enchantments and buffs this card has", …
Tutoring is always very strong, even with a puny body like this. If your deck contains only the best Beasts, this is guaranteed to draw the nuts. How about Moonfang, King Krush, Zixor (for example)? Or Trampling Rhinos in a …
Quote From DarkFrostX It can generate a body and help keep ramping or whatever you are doing but I dunno, I don't see this in any kind of current druid archetype aside from highlander, which since highlander cards …
You might be thinking of their comment about Dragon aspects. Both versions of the Dragons are in Wild because they are considered different cards. If a card's name hasn't changed, I would not expect to see the old version anywhere …
Quote From meisterz39 And that is what people are putting forth in these articles - the idea that the Core Set will be stronger and more valuable than the Classic/Basic sets ever were.
Well, we …
No one has been using [card]Deathwarden[/card] because you may face an opponent who doesn't even use Deathrattles. But if you want to suppress your own Deathrattles, it's suddenly a much better card. It may not always work out, but it …
Quote From meisterz39 Here's a more concrete example: imagine your local area is decreasing sales tax by 1% effective today. You might say that the sales tax decrease doesn't have any immediate benefit to you because you're not …
Quote From KANSAS The current basic/classic set contains very few useful cards. Which means in order to build a decent deck (50% winrate or above) you will have to rely heavily on expansion cards, which cost money. If …
Quote From KANSAS I don't get why we would handle certain quests differently just because some players dislike the objective of some quests more than others.
In the past, all quests were related to Hearthstone, …
Quote From meisterz39 I think you've largely side-stepped my point about sunk cost by saying that the value of these Classic cards has decreased. That's entirely true, but has nothing to do with the sunk cost fallacy. The …
Maybe [card]Stowaway[/card] can come back in Core. He'd be pretty nice with [card]Mankrik[/card].
Quote From KANSAS I think it is fine that some of the quests want you to play a specific mode. You get 3 quests and 7 chances to re-roll them, which makes it very easy to avoid doing …
Quote From h0lysatan While I agree that all quest should be able to be reroll, I wonder if there's gonna be any use for the 4th slot in the weekly quest. So far, Legendary quests always placed in …