The original card:                      My other idea:

One question, is it better to spell out "three" and "four" or is it better to simply put the number "3" and "4"? I would assume you could do either one, but whichever one makes the text look neater is better.

@Xarkkal, I think I like the card best when it adds 5 secrets at full cost. As we have seen from the first Subject 9, adding 5 secrets to your hand is very valuable. Playing 1 card to get 5 cards is already worth the Highlander restriction, making them cost 1 feels like overkill.

@Thez, I like the warrior version better. It is powerful and flavorful.

@shaveyou, I definitely think the first version is better. It has a nice police/law enforcement vibe with taxing your opponents minions. I would give it 4 stars, withholding one star only because I don't find anything particularly exceptional about it. It is fair, but not amazing.

@Swizard, I think either 9 or 10 mana would be fair. A total board wipe is worth 8 mana, add a body to that and it is worth more. You are also denying the opponent any opportunity to resurrect those minions, and you are shuffling some irrelevant draws into their deck. All in all it is a pretty cool card.

@DecentOfDragonsOP, The Battlecry feels a bit weird, it is like Tree of Life only worse, and Tree of Life is a pretty bad card. I like the Heal Druid support, but I would make the Battlecry a bit more relevant. Maybe make it restore 10 health? or 15? *edit* I see you adjusted the Battlecry and I think it looks much better now. 

@MenacingBagel, The card looks fine, but I am not sure how this card would be useful in-game. Basically, this card is 4 mana 3/4 Fungal Enchanter. I would maybe give him Elusive and change Pixi Dust to something more useful.

@Zeratia, first of all, this should say "Deathrattle" not "when this dies". That aside, the card looks really easy to abuse. You could transform or silence this guy and your opponents minions would never wake up. Now, playing an 8 mana card combined with another card to get rid of 3 minions isn't OP, it is the Dormant thing that worries me. If you do prevent this guy from triggering his Deathrattle then your opponent now only has 4 spaces on the board. Perhaps you could change it to work more like Carnivorous Cube where it destroys the minions instead of making them go dormant.

Demonxz95, I really like Al'ar of the Ice. It is a lot better than the Al'ar we have now and it is also very interesting from a game-play perspective. Freeze Mages usually want to stall until an OTK, but now they have an unkillable 7 attack beater. Do you use it to trade and stall further? Or do you use it to play an aggro-freeze Mage?

grumpymonk, I like Kealthas a lot better than Maiev. However, it does feel like there is a bit too much going on with the card. Giving your Hero Spell Damage +1 is really interesting since Spell Damage is really bad and this card makes it useful, and the "custom spell" is also really neat. But when you mesh these two ideas together it feels a little cluttered. It is hard to rate the card when it does so many things we haven't seen in Hearthstone before. I would stick with either the Spell Damage or the Custom Spell thing, but not both.

Xarkkal, I like the idea of Suject 9, but putting 5 Hunter secrets into play for free on turn 5 is super OP, even if they are random. I would simply make him add 5 random Hunter secrets to your hand. Making them cost 0 is too much, and I think making them all different is a bit unecessary.

Feuerrabe, I like the card a lot, but I would find better art that matches Hearthstones style more. 

SDhn2a, I like Y'shaarj the best, but I would adjust the stats/cost and give him Taunt. A 9 mana vanilla minion that summons a minion for your opponent is just bad. Look at Dirty Rat, this card has way more stats than his cost would imply, and he also has a relevant Keyword to help him out. 

RenoLord, I like the idea of Kel'thuzad bringing your Hero back as a lich, but all your opponent needs to do is just deal 5 extra damage to kill you. I would change the card to make your Hero Immune the first turn after you turn into a lich. Also, I am not sure about the Hero Power, it seems like it would be too easy to abuse this to get an OTK which, if you made the change I mentioned, would be inescapable. I would possibly change the hero power to be something powerful, but not something you can turn into an OTK.

HhyperOrange, Kelthu'zad is an interesting card, Leeroy is a funny joke card. I think the more serious card is much more likely to win. The only thing I don't like about Kelthu'zad is that he triggers at the start of your turn which both makes it impossible for him to kill frozen enemy minions, and it also makes him really slow and easy to answer. About your card last time, I didn't really know what to think about it. It was interesting, but ultimately felt useless. You spent 3 mana and a card to give them 0 mana and deny them a card. In the end, I couldn't think of any reason to play this. In most cases, those coins would be more helpful to your opponent than denying them the draw would be to you.

Thez, I don't really like this card. It breaks rogues theme of no Taunts and limited Healing. I would try and simplify the card by giving him maybe one keyword, and one other ability to synergize with Deathrattle minions. As he is now there is just so much going on it is hard to understand how powerful the card is.

Wailor, I like Harrison the best, though you should find some better art. Also, I don't think you need to say "from the past" because that is where most legendary weapons are already. And, legendary weapons that are from newer sets are still usually old artifacts.

Meisterz93, I really like the Curator. I think a lot of people would enjoy having more support for the menagerie thing.

MenacingBagel, It feels a bit weird having a heal effect in Mage, but other than that the card looks fine.

TheHoax91, I personally like greymane the best because enrage warrior is a lot of fun.

DestroyerR, Millhouse would just draw your entire deck and then kill you with fatigue on the spot, and I don't really like Hogger because the interaction with bouncing it to your hand feels weird, but I do like hakkar. I am not sure if it is too OP because you can use this with Plague of Flames on turn 5/6 and get a huge minion, or maybe 6 health is easy enough to remove that it shouldn't be too oppressive.

Swizard, I really like the new Malchezaar. It is sort of like Psychic Scream but only for highlander decks. However, you broke the unspoken rule of hearthstone card design: Never make a card with more than 4 lines of text. I would remove the "make them Legendary" bit because it is kind of pointless. Other than that, the card looks great!

@Linkblade91, This card is amazing. I really like the flavor and mechanics. I would vote it 5 stars simply because I can't think of any way to make it better. Well done.

@Demonxz95, I don't really like this card. The balance is okay, but the flavor is lacking. I can't really connect with this character or get a feel for him by looking at your card. I don't know exactly what to change, but as it is now it feels more like a mechanic than a character, if you know what I mean.

@DecentOfDragonsOP, I agree with what Demonxz95 said, this card either gives you a ton of burst damage right off the bat, or you just die. I don't think there is really a "right way" of making this card. You are either ahead and you play this and win, or you are behind and this is just a dead card in your hand.

@anchorm4n, I like the concept, but the card is flawed. For one, as ShadowOfSense pointed out, you would get infinite Deathrattle triggers. And also, Feign Death is a similar card which, as far as I know, never saw much play because it was too hard to set up a board big enough to get enough value. This is the same thing but for 5 more mana. I would keep the deathrattle theme, but make it something other than just "trigger deathrattles" because that idea has been done a bunch before.

@Conduit, About Manastorm, I think the 2 mana 4/4 version fits better thematically, but if you don't cast any spells this is just a 2 mana 4/4 no downside. I understand this is a Mage card and Mages cast spells, but I do think the downside is a bit too hit-or-miss, you either drop this on turn two and get a huge tempo swing at no loss, or you cast this alongside The Coin or a secret and all hell breaks loose. I don't think a yogg-saron this early in the game is very healthy, I would either keep the strong early game minion with a downside thing, or keep the "random spells" thing, but both paired together feels like too much too early in the game.

@CursedParrot, I like the idea of re-making Prince Malchezaar, but I don't like the card as it is now. It doesn't feel very relistic, it just feels like the Prince Malchezaar we have right now only with targeted Legendaries. I would keep the shuffling mechanic because that is cool and under-used in Hearthstone outside of Rogue, but I would tone down the ability to be a bit more simplistic.

@Menacing Bagel, This is an interesting card, I think there is a lot you can do with Brightwing. But I don't really like the "transform them into 1/5 sheep until the end of their turn" for two reasons. One, the text is kind of cluttered. It is a simple idea but it doesn't translate well into the text box. And two, it just feels weird. Transforming until the end of turn is an unusual thing, and making it a 1/5 sheep also just makes it feel unusual and unrealistic.

@Inconspicousaurus, I agree with Demonxz95 that tech cards shouldn't be class specific. To keep the "dragon hunter" theme without making him just tech against dragons, you could make him summon a dragon token for your opponent, and they could have some sort of synergy or specific interaction or something.

@Pokeniner, I really like giving mage some way to utilize Frozen minions, but I am a bit scared by the raw combo potential here. Something like "add random spells to your hand" or "cast random spells" or "draw cards" may be better, but ultimately I am not really sure what is best.

@TheHoax91, I am not sure about the Deathrattle thing. It is a cool idea, but in practice I don't think it adds anything positive to the game. Mechanically, this is virtually the same as just "gain 15 extra armor". To make it fit more thematically with the original Eydis, I would make the battlecry something that wants you to cast spells on your minions.

@MrRhapsody, I like Medivh the best, it is very flavorful. I am not too familiar with Medivh's story, but I know he was sucked into some kind of magic portal or something and he came out all dark and purple and stuff. Turning that story into a prime minion is genius.