Comments
Don't compare Corridor Creeper to evergreen cards. Nerfed for different reasons.
What is unclear about Monday or Tuesday. It means monday or tuesday.
Quote From melheor I was actually excited about Battlegrounds, but having played it for a day I must agree with other players. Here is a quote I made in another thread in response to it:
Quote From melheor So, having played early access battlegrounds, I wanted to share my thoughts. While overall a fun mode, …
Quote From Deliguy Other modes are not going to happen at this point. Hearthstone is dead in the water, at least to Blizzard, and this half baked attempt at an autochess competitor is an attempt to inject more people back into Hearthstone. They simply will not develop other game modes unless it earns them more money, but they …
Quote From Zwane But but but...where is your new Hero card? Nice to invoke stuff, but don't you also want the improved by invokers Hero Power card?
But maybe that is the one card you can not yet add since the site has no implementation yet? I count 29 cards in your deck.
lol …
[deck]8612[/deck]
This is my first go at a Galakrond Zoolock. I tried to keep it in the realm of competitive. I think there could be potential for things like Jumbo Imp or Plague of Flames, but I think those come in to target specific metagame things. Ditto to the rusher Invoker.
I think Veiled Worshipper is crazy powerful, …
That list looks really all over the place. Also, Ragnaros will have rotated out at that point.
I don't think the deck wants cards that are terrible if they don't cost 0. That seems to be a really inconsistent approach. Living Monument, Maly, Colossus.
It's fine.
I think it depends on the particular Galakrond.
I don't want this in Rogue (better removal) or Priest (bad hero power), but I probably want it in Warlock (where it becomes a 4 mana 2/2 rush and 2 1/1's). Maybe in Warrior because Town Crier synergy exists.
I would guess that this is probably a staple in Galakrond …
Primordial Drake was severely under appreciated when it was revealed. That was better than this card, but not by too much. There are classes that are traditionally weak at removal (druid, priest) that want things like this.
It's a card I think you're happy to see generated from other effects. You'd have to be a fairly dedicated dragon deck to want this. But it's a really fine card.
Will Dragon/Galakrond Control Warrior replace Mech-Boom Control Warrior? Maybe.
This card is actually pretty fine. Not good, but possibly good enough because Warlock needs something to do.
This card is perfectly reasonable.
I think Galakrond Warlock is a deck that's good enough. So I think this card is very good.
I wouldn't be so hard on this card just yet. The hero power has a lot going for it. And right now, warlock has very little going for it. Card like Plague of Flames and Grim Rally become a lot more interesting when you are Baku Paladin.
I expect Galakrond Warlock to replace Zoo because Zoo has been underwhelming for …
I think it's more likely this card is played as a generated card than something you put in your deck. In general terms, Quest Shaman wants minions, not spells, even considering the chances of Dragonic Lackey.
Unless there are one or two real, competitive, Battlecry Dragons for shaman. Then obviously, this becomes pretty nuts. (At this point, I'm not …
The only think that I don't like about this card is that it isn't a turn 1 play. Otherwise, it's really reasonable.
of the potential "dragon decks" rogue would probably be my bet to be the least likely simply because Rogue does so many other things so well.
That said, Rogue could probably generate enough dragons on average to make this playable without much/any support besides Waxadred.
I wouldn't be shocked if this card is played as maybe a 1-of.
Pretty reasonable include when Swashburgler rotates. Assuming the Vendetta package is still good...which it almost certainly should still be.