dapperdog

Its [card]Alliance bannerman[/card] for hunter, but made substantially worse by being a deathrattle.

So against aggro decks they just value trade this and give your hand a boost, for a class that doesnt run board as well as paladin, and against control this card is just useless, unless youre willing to kill it yourself.

Basically, the only good …

Its a one sided AoE for hunter, so it'll see play as long as the conditions arent difficult to manage. And highlander isnt exactly very difficult for hunter, with access to plenty of good cards.

I cant see any problems to this card aside from the highlander condition. There might be a card that counters highlander decks that might …

The one big positive about this card is that it does 3 damage to the face, and presents an opportunity to get a treasure that also deals 3 damage to the face for 1 mana. So sometimes a fireball, sometimes its a 6 mana flamestrike that does damage to face.

Im already fairly convinced that excavate will prove to …

This card has every right to be good. (Practically) 0 mana 7/7 taunt, in a class where [card]frostwyrm's fury[/card] basically just win games.

You have to simply respect cards like these in a class that can freeze, because for all intends and purposes this is just a tempo swing card that will more or less demand an answer or …

It'll likely get patched up, but from the very same source, plenty of others are claiming to have better performance with a few tweaks to the settings.

And probably need to download the newest nvidia patch, supposedly helps.

Its possibly just to take advantage of steam's higher exposure. Im sure they have the data since CoD is practically a yearly event at both platforms. I would be surprised if steam sales dont massively outdo those at battlenet's.

After all, steam charges a percentage for each sale. If they're willing to part with some cash its likely that …

Youre not actually playing it via steam right? Still need battlenet to actually play the game?

Likely to be fun, maybe. But assuredly money hungry.

Lol well, its not entirely unexpected.

Ive said this time and time again whenever toxic cards like [card]algalon the observer[/card], [card]bonelord frostwhisper[/card], [card]theotar, the mad duke[/card] etc. are printed: Why do it? If its good it'll be toxic, and if its not good then its completely unplayable. So what is the point, other than feeding more to players whose …

Its to do with the fact that both naga mage and APM druid tends to infuriate their opponents, and its also to do with the fact that hearthstone is played on an engine that doesnt speed up or skip animations and yet respects the turn timer, so what happens is (and very often on a phone) your opponent would be …

There's still plenty of combo decks in standard. Nature shaman, drum druid, moonbeam druid, and I guess you can put rainbow mage into that as well. Every one of those require intricate planning, and much brain power to maximize win potential.

What has been capped at the knee are decks that might be fun to play, but not fun …

Got the same problem. It is in fact updating but its not showing in google play, you can view it in your phone's taskbar. Either way, its only like 29mb so it wont take long.

After that I disconnected, reconnected and the game was playable. Weird shit, but at least I can play again.

We can see DK buffs and I can already tell you what it would likely be, its gonna be a rune rework. Because none of those cards are bad, its just trapped inside a shell that can never work, and team5 properly capped themselves in the knee trying to discourage players from those triple rune cards but its not gonna …

I think these list are outdated. Some of the miniset cards actually work themselves into meta decks, like [card]sanitize[/card] and [card]general vezax[/card] but more crucially, the fact that miracle druid and miracle rogue isnt here is perhaps an oversight.

I have actually been noticing that the wikis are lately taking up loads of processing cpu for some reason. Unsurprising that its the ads causing so much havoc.

I find it funny how something that was created for the public, by the public, would eventually go corporate and get ruined. Then the process starts anew. Can it not be …

This is just one of those crackpot ideas from team5 that seriously can never work from a PR perspective, because its either going to be completely forgettable or make competitive play unbearable.

So which does the current set of anomalies lie? I would say that while it is fairly benign, theres really no need for it to exist in …

I think team5 anticipated some trouble which is why the anomalies are only 100% for a week. They likely wanted to gauge player enjoyment and whether they gain more new players in because these 'tavern brawl' effects on competitive is what makes card games 'fun'.

Unfortunately, Im with you on the opinion that these anomalies are bad for competitive. …

Quote From anchorm4n

Honestly I think Undead Priest is still meta even without this new addition. VS rates it at tier 2 and I've piloted it to Diamond 6 on a 6-star bonus this month.

That said, rating the new card is pretty hard. I can see your argument, but on the other hand you usually want …

Its practically printed to give unholy DK, or more specifically plague DK, something they cannot have and that is consistent and good removal. At present moment, you can park [card]imposing anubisath[/card] in the field and plague DK just literally cant do anything to it.

This is the answer plague DK needs but sadly I dont think its enough. Its …

Decent card, probably best out of a discover, or you just play this instead of [card]holy smite[/card] for a more expensive but flexible removal option.

Nothing else to say really. Its gonna see play in priest, but its burn potential is nowhere near the level required for shadow priest to outdo control decks and the healing is negligible against …