dapperdog

Well, I wasn't expecting team5 to completely obliterate the two cards from wild.

[card]Spectral pillager[/card] is so terrible now its almost like a joke card. Might as well just gave it the warsong treatment, because in what world is this a card anyone would be playing? Couldve made it 3 mana to at least make it playable, but I …

So, some relief for wild players because there's plenty of OTK in that format. Addressing some of the more annoying ones is the right step. I dont play wild at a high level, but I feel not addressing [card]twig of the world tree[/card] bs is possibly a mistake.

But for standard, there's two very obvious candidates and a few …

To be fair, anything that isn't druid, priest or dhunter wouldn't be. And even then its 90% dhunter all day everyday.

The price adjustment is unfortunate, but predictable. Far as I understand, these countries dont pay in USD but on their own currency and fixed exchange rate (kinda like steam). So obviously with USD on the up its only a matter of time before they start changing the rates a bit. A moment of thought for those who have to pay …

[quote from="Update"]All classes will now have Corpses tracked throughout the game, in case they generate a Corpse-spending card. The Corpse Counter will be displayed while there are any Death Knight cards in a zone you can see (like in your hand or in play).[/quote]

Does this mean we can now effectively use DK cards as other classes, because previously …

Its obvious support for quest druid.

But low key this is just a good card for druids in general. Its better than most 1 mana removal options like [card]holy smite[/card], and in conjuction with cards like [card]park panther[/card], this card just deletes midrange stuff, which is something druids tend to struggle against.

I'll not be too surprised to …

More discolock synergy. But chances are good you'll forget the synergy and just play it for the 2 damage AoE anyway.

Wild discolock dont need this because they can win very well without any AoE, and standard discolock dont exist.

Possibly something that might get more interesting in future.

Im not that keen on it, but I acknowledge that this card may possibly be better than it looks.

Warlock cards tend to feature drawbacks which most other decks aren't prepared to meet. Like [card]soulfire[/card], etc. So chances are good that half the time your opponent would more rather avoid getting it right so as to not fill their …

Lol. But no.

Why would this ever see any play? There's no real setup for anything special, and both murlok and implock decks can't really afford to play both tempo and this card on the same turn without giving up on something. Besides, if I have to choose between playing [card]impending catastrophe[/card] and this card I think I know …

Basically for two months your [card]goldshire gnoll[/card]s have increased chance of turning into a [card]thaddius, monstrosity[/card]. It might legitimately be a real win con in of itself.

But outside of its obvious interaction with gnoll, its secondary function is to remove taunts or [card]radiant elemental[/card]s. That's about it really. Likely to see play as long as there's an obvious …

Its [card]seance[/card] for shaman, except its better in everyway shape and form.

Kinda dangerous honestly. Its low cost alone make it something that needs to be respected all the time.

Lol, how is this thing an elemental? Or are we suggesting that just because it looks like a murloc it must therefore be an elemental/murloc?

But whatever. This card is good if you can activate it. More so in aggro decks because getting rid of tokens is not something lots of deck tend to have. Against mirrors, this card …

More support for thief rogue.

Dont think it'll go into miracle though. [card]Backstab[/card] is readily available and yet that card hasn't seen play ever since edwin got nerfed. There's no reason to suggest this card is necessarily better than backstab, unactivated.

Its a good turn one. A decent addition into pirate rogue.

The problem? Well, pirate rogue kinda sucks. And it never really pick up play even during sunken city when it was good. Im more interested to see whether concoction tempo rogue is possible, because this card can fit in pretty nicely there.

Its a decent card for a deck no one plays.

Yes, this is a card for tempo rogue. Or pirate rogue, because that's about as aggressive as it gets for that class currently. On its own its not too bad, because most of the time it'll be a 6/6 for 3, probably too much to suggest that it'll be …

An omen that druid is going to get a card that expands their total mana cost next rotation? Because if they don't then this is practically one of the most unplayable card to exist in their library.

As it is, its already fairly bad on its own. Why would druid play a card like this, when two doesn't even …

It never ceases to amaze how team5's plan to fix druid is essentially just to print more broken stuff, then act surprised when druid spreads its toxic everywhere, subsequently nerf those cards and send druid straight back to hell. Rinse and repeat.

So will this card see play? Well that's an oxymoron isn't it. Its better to simply ask …

Druid and shaman cards look nuts.

Warlock and rogue...well, enough said.

I guess warlock getting another AoE and rogue getting another [card]vendetta[/card] is fine. Fortunately [card]ransack[/card] doesnt look like a miracle card, but I can be wrong on this one. Its basically a better [card]backstab[/card] most of the time.

Support for an archetype that currently can't breathe. For some reason this card is a deathrattle. Is it really that good that having it as a battlecry is too much to ask for?

Outcast dhunter needs a win con. This card isn't it, so I cant see why'd you play this over [card]dreadprison glaive[/card]. I suppose after rotation it …

The card suffers from consistency. Top deck this card and it does nothing more than a 6/7 for 6. Even if you dont top deck it you still need three spells to charge it up, so you're kinda forced into playing lots of spells in your deck. The more I think of the number of contrivances required for this to …