dapperdog
LV.20Dragon Scholar
Comments
5,694 totalNot too bad, especially given that it'll likely see play in control decks whether or not you have dragons in it. Not to mention that the card can give you [card]anachronos[/card], and that can sometimes save your life.
Might …
I have a strong feeling this card has been nerfed before launch, because this card looks awful. We already had this 4 years ago and his name is [card]scaleworm[/card], a card that saw some play but is frequently dropped in …
Its the real reason why you'd be playing dragon pally, not [card]anachronos[/card].
It may be slow, but that can be said to just about any paladin card that's not from this set. So its permissible to assume that a …
As with most of discard synergy cards, its bad when its not for free.
But in dedicated decks this card might just be what you need because as it stands Im not entirely sure what the wincon is for …
Its [card]arcane intellect[/card] in warlock, except you need to discard something. Or a reverse [card]tracking[/card], as others have pointed out.
But I'll be honest, this card will see play only because warlock draws like shit without imps and this …
Its not a good card, and very contentious in discolock, because you cant guarantee the damage into any specific target, and the way this card work you cant even guarantee when this thing comes out, which misses the whole point …
What team5 would have nerfed [card]doomguard[/card] into.
But as we have long established, remove the charge and doomguard is useless and this card is similarly so. It'll only ever be played in a discolock deck, because discarding is the …
There's so much potential here that this is surely a playable card, even in non discolock decks. Almost nearly 100% sure the legendary would be undead, to allow this card to cheat it out.
But as it stands, we …
The absence of [card]malchezaar's imp[/card] alone makes the build contentious to say the least. Not having both the end game of lakkari pit and the early game of [card]tiny knight of evil[/card] makes it even more so.
Im not …
[card]Irondeep trogg[/card] is in a class of its own, because its good on turn 1 with or without buffs. This card however, is reliant (currently) on one very exact card to replicate half of that power level. Not to mention …
So 1 parts dragons and the other part being aggro pally?
If the dragons have came out first I would have been concerned because its yet more evidence of stuff that are too slow and pally just fold to …
Well, here's the discolock we all wished for, right back from the dead.
There's certainly a deck somewhere here, because there's discard effects, there's payoff, and there's the crucial draw factor. But it remains to be seen if this …
Depends on how long they've held on to the their left most card, and how zealous they are with their board generators like [card]scale of onyxia[/card]. In my own experience playing against and with druid I always notice that the …
The problem with the card isn't its power level, but the fact that its stuck in a class like shaman that have no use of it.
Even if there's a deathrattle trigger yet to be revealed this card is …
Shaman needs deathrattle triggers or this card is complete trash. If you had a board then surely the correct card to play would be either [card]bioluminescence[/card] or [card]bloodlust[/card], both of which are not reliant on rng to hit face.
…
At first glance the card is broken as hell with cards like [card]deathweaver aura[/card], but on closer inspection, maybe not.
The main problem I have (thus far) with this card is that it only really works with one thing, …
I dont know, but it sounds very much more scarier on paper than it likely would in practice.
Because most decks that run removal can deal with 3 health on turn 1 and even if you see four 3/2s …
Looks good on paper, but let's be real here this card is shit.
If you have a board, then surely the correct card to play would be stuff like [card]bloodlust[/card], or [card]nofin can stop us[/card], or even [card]bioluminescence[/card], so …
Honestly, I dont quite like shaman's theme this time round, because it seems very highrolling. Plenty of ifs, and shaman being what it is today I dont like its chances in the new meta. Seems like if they get the …
[card]highlord fordragon[/card] has been viable before and in some handbuff decks hes still good.
But these cards are aggressive cards though, so I wouldn't count on him getting center stage in the next expansion.