dapperdog
LV.20Dragon Scholar
Comments
5,712 totalIts fairly bad. In big decks, this card is just sitting around until about turn 9 while the conditions hinder its consistency.
There's some synergy here with cards like [card]masked reveler[/card] and [card]sigil of reckoning[/card], getting some big demons …
This card is just tacit admission on how bad [card]kryxis the voracious[/card] really is even in a deck supposedly built around it.
Its basically playing the same role as kryxis, tempo and card draw, but functions much better because …
Its just removal for a class that never really relied on it. Why bother putting something to sleep when you can just ramp to you win con instead?
Most druids rather just rely on [card]druid of the reef[/card], or …
Its so bafflingly weak and redundant to print something like this for druid that I truly feel that the only reason for doing it is to thin out the choose one card quality for druid.
At very most it'll …
[card]Anonymous informant[/card] on 2, double secret on 3 and a 6/6 to boot. That's just insane. Basically this card is just a free 6/6 in a dedicated deck, why wouldn't anyone play it?
Fortunately secret mage cant draw for …
Even if it just poofs the minion away (and therefore not triggering deathrattles) its still just a discover option you rather have than being something you'll toss into your deck.
There's no control mage right now that doesn't already …
Alright, this card is 5 stars straight not merely because of the power level but also because you now need to test for it everytime your opponent plays something as innocent as [card]ice barrier[/card].
The level of stupid this …
[card]Siamat[/card] is better, [card]al'akir the windlord[/card] is better, [card]walking fountain[/card] is better, the list goes on and on.
The chief failing of this card is that its too expensive and conditional on your opponent's board. If they have only …
There's just too much rng involved for this card to ever be good enough and ironically stuff like these are specifically designed to not be good, because imagine having to skip a turn because of this horseshit. So why even …
[card]framester[/card] is a meme card that can legit be a real thing because cards like macaw exist. Played with bolner for that extra fuck you sauce on your opponent's steak. But as to whether it'll be competitive? Likely not. RNG …
[card]kidnap[/card] - Counters minions but not really. [card]Objection![/card] - Counters minions. Like seriously team5? Shafting rogues as we go along I think. But this and counterspell existing legitimately makes life miserable enough to make [card]tight-lipped witness[/card] go from absolute atrocious …
[card]Attorney-at-maw[/card] is just a redundant design which is infinitely made worse by the fact that starfish exists. The only way this card would see play is that the granted immunity is a selling point, and it just might, because it …
[card]All fel breaks loose[/card] is bad but it has potential because dhunter is a class that draws substantially enough that they can afford a couple of hold on cards. You can play your big demons, cheated out and whatnot, and …
At time of writing, dhunter has the best card so far because [card]prosecutor mel'tranix[/card] is completely broken and relic dhunter is already a decent tier 2 deck.
[card]Perjury[/card] is so good for secret rogue that I genuinely think they …
Probably unplayable unless we're in dire need of taunts. Even if its an 8/8 on 5, its just not good enough in a meta where most decks would start doing all manners of unfair shit.
At least the conditions …
Tutors weapons. That alone makes this card playable. Upgrades when you have it on hand as well? That's already more potential than [card]lady ashvane[/card] have in the past 3 months.
Solid and good. Something warrior would welcome.
Hard to evaluate this one because [card]theotar, the mad duke[/card] is so good I simply dont see why anyone would even bother with this card. The one good thing about it is that it costs only 1 and thus can …
Its dude pally support. More relevant in wild than in standard because in standard this deck isn't good.
But sometimes you'd have 2 dudes on 2 and your opponent cannot be arsed to kill them, letting you execute a …
This card will see play because paladin decks are wholly dependent on cariel or countess to actually do anything remotely useful in winning the game.
But I still think the card is bad. Costing 2 to draw 1 card …
Its not great but still decent for pure pally. Especially considering that it covers a hole which is being a removal option on a stick.
The problem is that even then this card doesn't do enough. Pure pally, and …