HuntardHuntard's Avatar

HuntardHuntard

Mailbox Dancer
Joined 12/03/2019 Achieve Points 875 Posts 744

HuntardHuntard's Comments

  • I really like this set so far. These cards are a little bit more complicated than what we usually get.

    edit: very interesting that most classes got an anti-aggro card or a lifesteal card. Seems as though Team 5 was wary of what aggro could do this expansion.

  • It makes sense that Blizz says as little as possible. They did the same with Blitzchung controversy. As long as they don't bring it up, the consumers will forget eventually. 

  • If you queued into a game with or against an opponent with a golden card from the base set, both players would disconnect. It was around for two or three days and made it really hard to find a game.

  • The Year of The Gryphon has not had great releases so far. With FiTB being near unplayable on release due to a bug, and recent events putting a damper on the mood. I just think this all will make the final set this year extra special if everything goes smoothly.

  • Then you would have payed 3 mana to draw a 3/4. Akama prime rarely has any impact, so you would be cluttering your deck up a lot.  It would be super cool if the meta did shift to it though lol

  • That is true. The main reason I included it was for the possibility you somehow broke your weapon before you could attack with it, such as accidentally using your hero power or forgetting to attack. 

  • Noticeable deathrattles this card can trigger are: Infiltrator Liliann, Ticket Master, Elewynn Boar (meme), Nerubian Egg, Showstopper (anti-libram?), explosive sheep (anti-aggro), and Death's Head cultist (for the healing).

  • This is so cool, I would check this out even if there weren't a free pack.

    edit: If I could play it, I keep getting errors with authentication lol

  • Monetary punishment is the only thing that large corporations respond to. If Blizzard isn't punished, then abuse by higher-ups will continue. Besides, even the CEO of Blizzard Bobby Kotick has a history of sexual abuse. I think that is very indicative of the company itself.

    Edit: Went to double-check, and it was sexual harassment, not sexual abuse. 

  • I do not think this is as bad as people are making it out to be. This looks like a tool for decks that plan to remove minions with face attacks, and against aggro games can get pretty tight that way. If you aren't going against an aggro deck, I imagine you would just mulligan it away similar to how other quest decks would mulligan their quest when they are going against aggro.

  • Thank you for the speedy reply.

  • Where was this hinted at? I can't seem to find it anywhere. 

  • It is pretty rude to reply with an ad hominem. If you cannot defend your point anymore, just do not reply.

  • It doesnt specify that the original cost has to be lower than two.

  • Good point. Cards whose cost you can reduce are going to be best with this. I think the best card to combo with this will be strong man.

  • I hope the screen revamp is as clean as pre-battle grounds screen was. I am really looking forward to the change.

  • There aren't a lot of spells to support this, but DH is still a new class so I expect this to be good one day.

  • It feels a little weird for one drop pally to get stuff 2 years after its creation. It could be a slow wincon for paladins akin to Justicar. 

    Edit: I read it as though only 1 drop minions worked with this. It totally works with secrets which is why I am willing to bet that secret paladin is going to be t1/t2. Disgusting late game value for a deck that runs out of fuel so fast.

  • I haven't done any of these but now that one is being released right before a expansion i will do so now. I really want to pull warlock's questline. 

  • Extremely power crept Crystalweaver. Crystalweaver saw play with zoo, so if zoo is viable then it is logical this will too.