KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
This is free stuff, so I really shouldn't complain, but this is half of what you would get from making rank 5, which plenty of people do every month. This hardly seems like enough to celebrate 25 years.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
This ban makes sense. I made a Oko brawl deck and whenever I kinda felt like winning I would just play with that deck and BAM! 4 minutes later I would win.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
I only made a twitter account so I could participate in these giveaways. I have never wanted a twitter account before, and I haven't used it since I made it.
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.
They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.
What you are doing here is finding fault with anything blizzard do. It is just funny how you defend yourself with a meaningless sentence differencies between cards. It is not like the difference between "Adapt 2 times" "adapt, then adapt" or " adapt twice". It is just same sentences in different order, doesn't even mislead people.
Why are we arguing this? it is just silly.
I am not trying to hate on blizzard simply for the sake of hating on blizzard.
That one guy mentioned that this card was inconsistent with other dragon cards, and I was just trying to explain why.
You are right though that this argument is a little silly. So lets just agree to disagree and end it here.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
The more I think about this card, the more I like it. For one, it is a dragon, and the main use of dragons in dragon decks is not to play them, but to save them to trigger all of their dragon synergies. So having dragons that are situational is okay.
Against a wide board, Deathwing is basically a not-so-reliable board clear. But against just one or two minions, deathwing is basically a 12/12 with rush. Similar to the original Deathwing, Mad Aspect will, more often than not, clear the board and leave behind a very large threat.
This card is basically a much more reliable Swamp King Dred. I think it will see play in dragon warrior (and big warrior, if that ever becomes a thing).
P.S. Why is his name 'mad aspect' instead of 'aspect of madness'? This would be more consistent with the new malygos, and it would sound a lot cooler.
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
Still there is not any inconsistency. "if you're holding a dragon, Give it Divine Shield." and "Give it Divine Shield if you are holding a dragon." are same sentences. There is not any ambiguity.
They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.
Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.
Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?
Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄
It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.
Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
we'd said same things already. If you look awarely, there is a dot after +1/+2. It basically has 2 effects in 1 spell and "If you're holding a dragon" part is still before the effect which is about holding dragon, that's the divine shield part.
They taught us "if" sentences as they are same when you say "if I can come home earlier, we might go to the cinema" or "We might go to the cinema if I can come home earlier." So I get it like there is no inconsistency here.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
if you are going to spend all your mana on one card, it has to be very relevant and/or very pro-active. This card will have an immediate, and impactful effect as soon as you play him. This is not the worst card for a neutral common, but the best part is, its a dragon.
When you play a dragon deck, it doesn't really matter whether or not the dragons are playable, you aren't playing dragons, the entire point of a dragon deck is that you don't play the dragons so you can gain benefit from all of your dragon synergy cards. So it doesn't really matter if this guy is kinda slow or too situational to be consistent, all you need to do is have him in your hand, and then later if you are in a pinch, you can play him to help you trade into your opponents board.
Why can't they just stay consistent with the way they write the text.
Why switch "if you're holding a Dragon" to AFTER the effect now?
Love your work, Blizzard... 🙄
It just works how the text describes. If you are not holding a dragon it just gives +1/+2 to a minion. If there is a dragon in your hand it also gives divine shield.
Sorry but there is no inconsistency here.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 5 years, 1 month ago
This card is pretty good. a 1/3 can make pretty good trades with other 1-2 drops, and with the extra 2 damage hunter should have no problem controlling the board through the first few turns.
This is free stuff, so I really shouldn't complain, but this is half of what you would get from making rank 5, which plenty of people do every month. This hardly seems like enough to celebrate 25 years.
I think you did something wrong, I put that into google translate and I got "Fancy pickle melon".
This is good news. It means we will all be getting free packs!
Even though that video was basically just 'hey we have two more people on our team now' Ben Brode made it a delight to watch.
This ban makes sense. I made a Oko brawl deck and whenever I kinda felt like winning I would just play with that deck and BAM! 4 minutes later I would win.
I only made a twitter account so I could participate in these giveaways. I have never wanted a twitter account before, and I haven't used it since I made it.
oh, I voted for the other team.
I have about a 1% chance of winning.
At least there is a chance . . .
I am not trying to hate on blizzard simply for the sake of hating on blizzard.
That one guy mentioned that this card was inconsistent with other dragon cards, and I was just trying to explain why.
You are right though that this argument is a little silly. So lets just agree to disagree and end it here.
Nov 29, 5:00 A.M. looks like a geared-up Muckmorpher
I tried the location spoof thing, but it didn't work because I wasn't connected to the right wi-fi.
The more I think about this card, the more I like it. For one, it is a dragon, and the main use of dragons in dragon decks is not to play them, but to save them to trigger all of their dragon synergies. So having dragons that are situational is okay.
Against a wide board, Deathwing is basically a not-so-reliable board clear. But against just one or two minions, deathwing is basically a 12/12 with rush. Similar to the original Deathwing, Mad Aspect will, more often than not, clear the board and leave behind a very large threat.
This card is basically a much more reliable Swamp King Dred. I think it will see play in dragon warrior (and big warrior, if that ever becomes a thing).
P.S. Why is his name 'mad aspect' instead of 'aspect of madness'? This would be more consistent with the new malygos, and it would sound a lot cooler.
They are both the same sentence, and they both mean the same thing, but the way the sentence is formatted is different than on the other cards, and is therefore, an inconsistency.
oh I hope so. I need a cool mage portrait.
look at cards like Breath of Dreams, Corrosive Breath, Lightning Breath, and Molten Breath. All of them say "do effect X. If your holding a dragon, do effect Y". Sand Breath is the only dragon card in existence that says "if your holding a dragon" at the end of the card.
You are right in that it is grammatically correct, but it is not consistent with other Hearthstone cards.
This is great!
I don't play priest, but any free stuff is always welcome.
you can never have enough battlecries! NEVER!!
if you are going to spend all your mana on one card, it has to be very relevant and/or very pro-active. This card will have an immediate, and impactful effect as soon as you play him. This is not the worst card for a neutral common, but the best part is, its a dragon.
When you play a dragon deck, it doesn't really matter whether or not the dragons are playable, you aren't playing dragons, the entire point of a dragon deck is that you don't play the dragons so you can gain benefit from all of your dragon synergy cards. So it doesn't really matter if this guy is kinda slow or too situational to be consistent, all you need to do is have him in your hand, and then later if you are in a pinch, you can play him to help you trade into your opponents board.
The card will always give a minion +1/+2 whether or not you are holding a dragon. But it will only give divine shield if you are holding a dragon, so I should think it would read "Give a minion +1/+2. If you are holding a dragon, give it Divine Shield" but instead it says "Give a minion +1/+2. Give it divine shield if you are holding a dragon".
If this card was consistent with other dragon cards it would say 'if you're holding a dragon' before the ability that wants you to be holding a dragon, but this card says 'if you're holding a dragon' after the ability.
I am not 100% sure if this is accurate, this is just how I think it should work.
This card is pretty good. a 1/3 can make pretty good trades with other 1-2 drops, and with the extra 2 damage hunter should have no problem controlling the board through the first few turns.