Shaman's have plenty of ways to transform enemy minions, how about they transform their own minions for a change?

Next Art:

Make an Epic Elemental minion with the art from this token.

Leeroy seems like an obvious choice.

The idea is that with your opponent having two 1/1's you would probably lose the first 2 combats, but in compensation for that you would be able to spend the first few turns building up a bigger board. 

Later in the game your opponent wouldn't have room for the extra 1/1's, but also having one more tavern tier would be less important.

I agree with everything except for perhaps the onions, I think the onions kinda take over the entire sandwich and make the whole thing taste like onions. But I agree on the avocados, they are one of my favorite foods!

To each his own, taste is subjective.

I agree that cheese is a little over-rated by some people, but it is good on more than just pizza for sure!

I don't know about everyone else but I personally think mustard is super gross. And also orange cheese isn't natural. 

I prefer my grilled cheese with pepperoni and Munster. 

Quote From griffior

3. I've already said it once but I'll say it again, they should not nerf cards in wild and should've un-nerfed (Yogg, Tuskar, Molten Giant to name a few) cards when they rotated 

They did un-nerf Molten Giant when he rotated. I wish they had done that with other cards as well (such as yogg). This would make wild much more interesting and it would play a big role in attracting standard players to wild.

"Are you sad that yogg got nerfed? well now you can play him in all his former glory in a new format that will require you to spend lots of time/dust/money to play." 

It sounds like blizzard could be making money off of pushing wild more.

The first comment was by Helicon1. The second comment after mine was by Majere. I think you maybe mistook them for the same person.

Quote From craigrs84

You cant change it so why whine/debate about it?  No one is going to read this thread and feel guilty about playing a tier 1 deck in casual, and you're only reaching a minority of hearthstone players on these forums anyways.  So this conversation will have about zero impact.

People will do what they want to do ;)

Sort of the same thing as complaining about netdecking in general.

Not all discussions have to be for the sake of change. Sometimes it is nice to have discussion for the sake of discussion :)

It is a 'hot standard deck' because it has a better view-upvote ratio than other decks on this site. 'hot standard deck' doesn't exactly mean a good standard deck, it is just a deck on this site that has more up-votes than other decks on this site.

you literally just put 30 copies of ragnaros in a deck and are now upset that you got downvoted.

nice.

just because something is labeled 'just for fun' doesn't mean people have to appreciate it.

It was sarcasm.

The issue with sarcasm on the internet is that there is no tone of voice or body language, so it can be hard to tell sometimes.

I think the best nerf to this guy would be to make him a 6/6 so that was no one would ever even want to evolve him. This should solve the issue of people abusing evolve to get giant minions on turn 4/5.

Quote From Marega

Just end the reward of 3 wins 10g in casual and problem solved

Again, I don't think removing the 10g would stop people from playing T-1 decks in casual. I think people take for granted the amount of people gold farming. 10 gold every 3 wins is a terrible way to earn gold. Honestly, you would earn more rewards if you spent that time farming ranks. You might win slightly less, but in addition to earning gold, you are also earning dust/cards at the end of the month.

There is this weird glitch where all of my free cards have tripled. I have 6 copies of all my basic cards, and I also have triple the amount of all of the wild cards that came back to standard. Every time I go to my collection there is the little dust symbol telling me I need to Disenchant some cards, but I can't because they are all un-craftable.

literally the only sentence in the guide is "REPLACE SAFEGAURD WITH SATHROVARR".

Quote From OmarComing

I do think it would be good to remove the gold farming from casual though. Just make it so you can only earn gold on the ladder, and I believe it would change the makeup of casual dramatically. Completing quests is fine, just remove the 10g earnings.

It seems kinda silly to me that people want there to be less rewards for playing Hearthstone.

I don't play much ranked, so this would make me lose about a third of the gold I collect. Also, I don't think it would solve the issue. I don't think the people playing T-1 decks in casual are doing so because it is an easy way to farm gold, if you have a 60% winrate and an average hearthstone game takes about 10 minutes, then after about 8 hours you would get 1 pack. This reward system is awful and I don't think playing in casual as opposed to ranked does much to help you make more gold. We don't get much rewards for playing Hearthstone beyond the daily quest, and as a F2P player I would hate to lose what little gold I had.

Quote From ArngrimUndying

Quote From Bersak

I‘m a little tired of those casual complains. I get your point, you want those Trolden worthy Highkeeper Ra or Desert Obelisk finishes... well they aren‘t worth a dime if you have to face a Mecha‘thun hunter to get there. You may aswell play against the inkeeper.

Other people use casual as a place to learn new decks they just crafted. How can you blame them for that?

Can‘t you just see netdecks as the ultimate challenge for your homebrew? If you can’t get to 40% winrate, the roblem may not be the netdeck but your own.

It‘s like casually playing Tennis but using a badminton racket.

 

That's not an apt analogy at all.

A better one would be: I'm an amateur tennis player at my local club looking to casually play against other middle-age weekend schlub players, except wow look at that today my opponent is Rafael Nadal. Mr. Nadal could and should easily find better opponents than me, but here he is kicking my teeth in because he wants to try out a new backhand or restrung racket.

See how that might make me resent him for raining on my parade even though he may have a "good reason" for doing so?

I don't think this is a very good analogy either. What you said is more like what if Thijs wanted to fight against someone who has only been playing for a week. Playing a good deck doesn't mean you are on-par with pro players.

I am fine with meta-decks in casual because it is not against the rules and I personally feel like it is a little silly complaining that your opponent is playing good cards and now you can't win with your bad cards. Tier-1 decks don't 'belong' in ranked mode, Ranked mode was not made as a place for T-1 decks to be played, and casual mode was not made as a place for bad decks to be played. I think some people don't understand that.

I am not saying that I don't agree with you, but evolve is rotating out in a month.

Is casual a place where there is supposed to be no tier-1 decks? or is it supposed to be just like ranked mode with no risk/rewards? What is your philosophy about the Casual format?

I personally think that Casual is a place where you can play whatever deck you want without having to worry about winning or losing. I think that looking at he format as a place where tier 99 decks can be viable is the wrong way of looking at it. I enjoy playing casual because I can be at rank 7 - 5 stars and still be able to try out a odd homebrew deck without having to worry about falling back to rank 10.

I would like to get that medivh because he is the best looking mage portrait I have ever seen. But 7 bucks is too much just to get a cosmetic.