I have played Mana Tide Totem enough to know that this card is not very good. It is also worse than EVIL Cable Rat because when you play this, you have to wait until next turn to play the lackey, but with the rat you have the lackey for the same turn, and that makes this much worse tempo.

Quote From RandomGuy

Quote From W0lfr1c

give a minion reborn ?

That sounds pretty likely!

I dont think so.

I don't think they would make a lackey like that because it would require too much setup and synergy with the right minions. all lackeys so far are pretty easy to use in most situations, they help you some with small effects, and the opponent can get over it. giving a minion reborn feels like a kind of effect you would want to choose and put in a deck with deathrattles and taunts and stuff, it does not feel like the kind of effect you would want to get from a random source. 

but I would not be surprised if they made a priest card that was 1/2 mana give a minion reborn.

this card can get you huge value, but I think it is okay at 5 mana because you want to play this when your hand is low, and also when you have enough mana to avoide burning a card.

next art:

it can be a minion or a spell, but it must have a negative effect on a enemy minion

Quote From YJHS2000

This seems strictly worse than Jungle Giants, and that card never really worked. You can't control which cards get the reduction, so this wont work with combos. Unless there's some insane support, I don't see this getting play

this and jungle giants are very diferent cards.

they are both quests and they both make things cost 0. this is it basically.

I think this card is great! for one, the requirement is not that hard, as many have mentioned, plot twist can work out with this. but also, just simply playing control warlock means you will be drawing cards. also, the reward is not a clunky 5 mana card, but it automatically upgrades your hero power, which makes it much more usable. 

I personally would rate this card 4 stars.

mindblast and vanish just got sent to the hall of fame. and they were made into commons. which means that you can DE your golden copies for 200 dust, or if you want to keep your golden copies you can scrap the regular ones for 20. just thought I would let everyone know. 

I really don't like Headcrack or Deadly Shot.

headcrack looks too cartoonish, and it really just looks like a troll making a fighting pose. the old art illustrated what the card did, and it looked and felt more real.

deadly shot is now just an arrow, why? there wasn't much blood in the art before. the old art was good because it was a arrow that killed someone, now it is just an arrow. but what I mainly don't like is all the orange. it is too bright, and empty. 

my favorite change is probably to Windfury Harpy and [Hearthstone Card (succubus) Not Found]/Felstalker. not because they were to sexual, but because the new art is better.

before, windfury harpy was making that weird pose, and it was kinda discerning. this one looks more like a threatening monster, less like a trapeze artist with wings.

I like felstalker better than succubus because in general I like demon monsters better than demon people. the new card I think is better thematically, and succubus didn't really make sense when you think about it. why was she stealing your cards? having it be a demon-dog makes more sense for that. 

Quote From Demonxz95

Quote From Thonson

Quote From DrGoodie

They literally removed Succubus as a card and replace it with a random demon. LMAO

 

And Headcrack looks like hot garbage now. Come on, Blizzard

Felstalker is the same card as Succubus, but with "less offensive art" (?)  At least until someone starts finding Felstalkers sexual!  And the Felstalker pet for Warlocks in WoW is a pretty classic thing related to that class.  Similar to Voidwalker.

With that in mind, I get why they changed it to Felstalker, but I'm still a little unsure of why it had to be changed so much instead of just updating the card art.  Also, I'm confused by Mistress of Pain being changed to Queen of Pain.  Is "mistress" a bad word in some parts of the world?

From what I understand, "mistress" sounds a bit too "BDSM-ish", although I thought that was supposed to be the point. You know, with the whip and everything?

Hilariously, now that they changed the name, they will need to change the flavor text as well, because it made a joke relating to the name.

they did update the flavor text of queen of pain and fel stalker.

succubus used to say "warlocks have it pretty good" but now reads "this puppy chews up cards instead of shoes"

what exactly is the point of having baku in here? is choosing the totem really that good? is it really worth losing all even cards in the deck?

Next Art:

No rectrictions

also, I don't know if you have looked into this yet, but I would like to know what named characters from WoW we are going to see in this expansion s we can know which legendaries to make.

Quote From Wailor

Next: do whatever you want.

please post an Image for the next card.

that is half the point of the thread, you can't just not do it.

Quote From FishyChan

Check this:

https://outof.cards/forums/fan-creations/custom-hearthstone/756-lets-make-an-expansion-cards

how about instead of posting our cards in a separate thread, we can post our cards here and you can update the OP to have them all there. so that was we don't have 2 threads about one thing 

yeah, its 100% league of explorers

I agree, the problem with cards like defile is that it is so useful that no other cheap AOE spells get printed for warlock in year of the raven, so now that year of the mammoth is gone, control warlock is lacking in early game removal.

Next Art:

Must be a spell, and it must interact directly with an opponents minion

a 12 mana card to screw over Conjurer's Calling. 

next art:

must be a hunter minion, and must have some pro-active effect.

Next art:

Must be a minion, and it must have taunt. the rest is yours.

Quote From BasilAnguis

I think this site only accepts linking images from https://imgur.com/ as source. If you link to an image from another site it doesn't show (or it only shows to you).

I store all my images to google docs before posting and as far as I know it works fine. so that is also an option other than Imgur

Quote From NightCrawler

Quote From Kovachut

Quote From NightCrawler

Quote From Kovachut

I think, yeah, the bundle is worth the money. If I were you, I would definitely buy it. 56 packs for 35$ sounds like a good deal.

 

Warning! The first-legendary-in-the-first-10-packs rule DOESN'T apply, if you already have opened some packs from a specific set. Since you started playing since Naxx, you would have probably purchased GvG, TGT and/or WotoG/MSoG with gold and thus you won't get a guaranteed legendary in those 8 packs. I don't know when you stopped playing hs, but if there are some wild sets, which you haven't purchased yet, you would get a legendary 80% of the time there.

This is not true.  The 10 packs rule does apply as long as you have not bought these wild packs after the rule was implemented.  Opening packs before the rule does not trigger the timer.  I've purchased 15 packs from each rotated set after the 10 packs rule was announced and had legendaries within the first 10 packs each time.  I believe there is a pack opening thread on HP for people doing the same but I'm too lazy to dig it up.  It was something to the tune of "post your 10 pack legendaries from each wild expansion".  I was so hyped to play with my new Blingtron :P

Of course 8 is less than 10, so the point might be moot anyway.  Maybe all your legendaries will be in the 9th and 10th packs   

https://us.battle.net/forums/en/hearthstone/topic/20758626285#post-2

https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/general-discussion/217757-guaranteed-legendary-in-first-10-packs

I stand corrected then.  That's pretty weird.  I guess a bunch of us got lucky at once or they shadow changed it at some point

me, and my two friends all got legendaries in the first ten packs after the patch was released, even with sets we had opened before, and the chances of that happening to three of us, from several different sets, is too small for me to believe otherwise. so I guess they just made a change at some point, the chances of this happening are too good for anything else to be true.