An anti-Secret tech that Heals you for each destroyed Secret
An anti-Reno version of Loatheb (6-mana, maybe a Dragon?).
Basically, i really want more smart cards that can easily be included in a deck, and that do not kill the opponent's strategy, but they reward you for timely plays.
And i think that these kind of cards would greatly help Wild from turning into a deranged trashbin.
Personally, i value my time more than that of my opponent, so i would never get into a rope battle, for a sealed match, just to fight fire with fire...
The situation, this "unplayability", is caused by poor design choices. On MtG even the more extended formats still have some balance (more or less).
This.
If they stopped designing broken cards (Plague of Flames, Crystology, [Hearthstone Card (arcane mysteries) Not Found]) upon old flawed cards (Mechwarper), upon stupid cards (Arcane Flakmage), or at least if they regularly fixed these flaws, Wild would be much more pleasant and enjoyable on the long run, while still including some OP decks (which is inevitable).
If Wild turns into an increasingly rotten dumpster, i will simply stop playing, as i have no interest in Standard.
Wild is (could be) cool because it has all the cards: if the vast majority of cards are practically excluded by the brokenness of few, then it's just a broken version of Standard, restricted by brokenness instead of rotations...
Personally, i'm progressively growing sick of Wild.
Secret Mage, Snipsnaplock and Mech Pally are sheer cancer, as they are essentially all Burn decks, and top tier.
No healthy meta has so many Burn decks on the very top of the tiers.
Even worse for Warlock, which is further internally cancerized: playing any Warlock that is not Snipsnap is straight out stupid or masochistic (at least Mage has Reno and Pally has Odd).
I guess this is the beginning of the end for RavenSunHS...
Not really a staple, because she requires you do adjust the deck around her (ie cheap, efficient overload cards, eg Zap!).
You can obviously play Even Shaman without her, and the deck is still going to be very good, so, since you are being careful with dust, i advice to craft her ONLY if Shaman is a class you really like to play.
In Wild, Zihi in Even Paladin has won me some games against OTK decks.
Not so strong against Midrange/Control, since they have more resources, and can typically just wait and kill you later.
In that case you need a strong swing turn of your own right after Zihi (and hope it is enough).
In general, i'd suggest to just build a strong Aggro deck with Silence tech cards, Spellbreaker and even Shieldbreaker, if the Wall of the Dead is so popular.
There must be a rule or a principle of neutrality, simply because it would be utter chaos otherwise, in an international environment. It's called common sense, and it doesn't need to be written.
Even if we assume such a principle is not obvious, your argument is just as baseless (or relative) as mine.
Preposterous. Sporting events and award ceremonies have often been used to express political messages, so not only are you citing a rule which doesn't exist, when cornered you're claiming that the opposite of reality is "common sense".
Unless the rules prohibit it, there is no principle or common understanding that a winner can't talk about whatever he wants during an interview. If you have no argument left to present, just concede the point rather than insisting, sans reasoning, that my claims are as baseless as yours. They really really aren't, hence why I'm citing documents and statements and you keep moving the goalposts hither and tither.
You fail to fully understand what you read.
Common sense is not the stack of historical precedents, as you assumed in your first preposition.
Common sense is knowing that bringing up hot political issues in an international sports event may have consequences.
Common sense is preventing your sports events become a circus of political agendas in the future.
My argument has never moved beyond the difference between "rule" and "principle".
If you fail to understand my argument, by virtue of the non-written, as if it was a trial with a system of laws and lawyers (hint: it is not), it's not my problem, and i don't need to concede anything.
At this point, i don't expect to make myself any clearer to you, and i won't argue any further (i have no trial to win).
Brack, in his post (in the news), mentions "rules" that Blitzchung agreed to upon participation.
And inconsistency of rule application does not imply the rule is wrong, nor that ALL its applications are wrong.
Blitzchung did the right thing, but he broke the rule/principle of neutrality of the event (hence the punishment). The two things can co-exist together. No contradiction is implied.
He references a rule but doesn't cite it. The only rule blizzard did cite is the aforementioned catchall clause. Obviously Blitzchung came to some sort of agreement with blizzard and they put out joint statements containing the same lawyerly language and including a non-admission by blitzchung that he "took the focus away from the game with his comments".
Which, again, and ad nauseam, isn't prohibited by any rule blizzard has produced thusfar.
I don't care about other inconsistent applications of rules, here I'm talking about blizzard's hypocrisy specifically. If you cannot show me the rule that blitzchung broke then I won't concede he did anything wrong. Here's the rulebook. Doing a simple word search gives us exactly zero hits for "politics" or "neutrality" and I couldn't find anything in the player conduct section, but maybe I'm wrong. Show me the rule or stop asserting that it exists.
There must be a rule or a principle of neutrality, simply because it would be utter chaos otherwise, in an international environment. It's called common sense, and it doesn't need to be written.
Even if we assume such a principle is not obvious, your argument is just as baseless (or relative) as mine, about Blitzchung acting correctly or not.
PS: i don't care of hypocrisy (in this my interventions in this thread). As i stated, my posts were directed to those who think there should have been no serious punishment for the Blitzchung case, by virtue of just cause.
They brought back Inspire undercover, at least for Hunter so far.
Even/Odd will get fresh meat to feed upon.
A mix between C'Thun and DK cards.
Not a fan of this one.
Looking forward to seeing the rest of the set.
Not a fan of this Galakrond thing, but i'm having a Cardgasm for my Even Hunter.
And what should they do?
As the title says. Whether it is something healthy or not. It's just a wish.
I'll start with mine, from my own Wild perspective:
Basically, i really want more smart cards that can easily be included in a deck, and that do not kill the opponent's strategy, but they reward you for timely plays.
And i think that these kind of cards would greatly help Wild from turning into a deranged trashbin.
Since today, to me the game crashes systematically after few seconds in the home screen.
There is also no Innkeeper voice introduction, despite sounds being up.
My guess is that the snow is a sign of Northrend, the coldest continent.
Lazul is probably speaking from a tavern in there.
Northrend, Dalaran, Dragons.
The hype is real.
I admire your patience.
Personally, i value my time more than that of my opponent, so i would never get into a rope battle, for a sealed match, just to fight fire with fire...
But i do so, if the match is still open.
That must've been one hell of a bug if it took so long.
Glad it's going to be fixed. It was about time.
#feels #nostalgia
This.
If they stopped designing broken cards (Plague of Flames, Crystology, [Hearthstone Card (arcane mysteries) Not Found]) upon old flawed cards (Mechwarper), upon stupid cards (Arcane Flakmage), or at least if they regularly fixed these flaws, Wild would be much more pleasant and enjoyable on the long run, while still including some OP decks (which is inevitable).
If Wild turns into an increasingly rotten dumpster, i will simply stop playing, as i have no interest in Standard.
Wild is (could be) cool because it has all the cards: if the vast majority of cards are practically excluded by the brokenness of few, then it's just a broken version of Standard, restricted by brokenness instead of rotations...
Personally, i'm progressively growing sick of Wild.
Secret Mage, Snipsnaplock and Mech Pally are sheer cancer, as they are essentially all Burn decks, and top tier.
No healthy meta has so many Burn decks on the very top of the tiers.
Even worse for Warlock, which is further internally cancerized: playing any Warlock that is not Snipsnap is straight out stupid or masochistic (at least Mage has Reno and Pally has Odd).
I guess this is the beginning of the end for RavenSunHS...
I imagine it is a complicated/deep bug, yet no ETA for the fix, after so many days, is unbelievable.
Especially for a game that is so deeply designed for mobile usage.
Right now the game is unplayable.
Vessina is very good in Even Shaman.
Not really a staple, because she requires you do adjust the deck around her (ie cheap, efficient overload cards, eg Zap!).
You can obviously play Even Shaman without her, and the deck is still going to be very good, so, since you are being careful with dust, i advice to craft her ONLY if Shaman is a class you really like to play.
I guess a new patch will be released right after Halloween.
Good it was found. It took them a bit too long, considering how annoying the issue is...
In Wild, Zihi in Even Paladin has won me some games against OTK decks.
Not so strong against Midrange/Control, since they have more resources, and can typically just wait and kill you later.
In that case you need a strong swing turn of your own right after Zihi (and hope it is enough).
In general, i'd suggest to just build a strong Aggro deck with Silence tech cards, Spellbreaker and even Shieldbreaker, if the Wall of the Dead is so popular.
And/or Plague of Murlocs in a Murloc deck.
You fail to fully understand what you read.
Common sense is not the stack of historical precedents, as you assumed in your first preposition.
Common sense is knowing that bringing up hot political issues in an international sports event may have consequences.
Common sense is preventing your sports events become a circus of political agendas in the future.
My argument has never moved beyond the difference between "rule" and "principle".
If you fail to understand my argument, by virtue of the non-written, as if it was a trial with a system of laws and lawyers (hint: it is not), it's not my problem, and i don't need to concede anything.
At this point, i don't expect to make myself any clearer to you, and i won't argue any further (i have no trial to win).
There must be a rule or a principle of neutrality, simply because it would be utter chaos otherwise, in an international environment. It's called common sense, and it doesn't need to be written.
Even if we assume such a principle is not obvious, your argument is just as baseless (or relative) as mine, about Blitzchung acting correctly or not.
PS: i don't care of hypocrisy (in this my interventions in this thread). As i stated, my posts were directed to those who think there should have been no serious punishment for the Blitzchung case, by virtue of just cause.