Welcome to the Hearthstone realm!
Priest is completely broken in Wild. Here some suggestions how to balance it.
Wave of Apathy -> 2 mana
Mass Hysteria -> 6 mana
Psychic Scream -> 8 mana
Palm Reading -> 4 mana
Archmage Vargoth -> 5 mana
Raise Dead -> 1 mana
Spirit Lash -> 3 mana
And no I don`t vote for one of these nerfs, I vote for ALL of them.
PS: Over 40% of my meta at rank diamond 5 is Priest.
Sign in to share your thoughts, vote on comments, and connect with the community.
Priest is completely broken in Wild. Here some suggestions how to balance it.
Wave of Apathy -> 2 mana
Mass Hysteria -> 6 mana
Psychic Scream -> 8 mana
Palm Reading -> 4 mana
Archmage Vargoth -> 5 mana
Raise Dead -> 1 mana
Spirit Lash -> 3 mana
And no I don`t vote for one of these nerfs, I vote for ALL of them.
PS: Over 40% of my meta at rank diamond 5 is Priest.
Quote From Maurice Priest is completely broken in Wild. Here some suggestions how to balance it.
Mass Hysteria -> 6 mana
Psychic Scream -> 8 mana
Palm Reading -> 4 mana
Archmage Vargoth -> 5 mana
Raise Dead -> 1 mana
Spirit Lash -> 3 mana
And no I don`t vote for one of these nerfs, I vote for ALL of them.
Maybe I'm a bit biased as a Priest Main, but ... isn't that a bit much? Like, I get that some archetypes can be very frustrating to play against, but that's not a reason to completely butcher a class.
Judging them individualy though, I could get behind your changes to Raise Dead and Psychic Scream. These cards are REALLY strong, and I wouldn't be surprised if those nerfs might become reality.
I'd say that increasing Mass Hysteria's Mana cost might kill that card. At 6 it would compete with Lightbomb and Dragonfire Potion, which are, at least imo, more reliable.
Same goes for Spirit Lash. 3 Mana for 1 damage AoE is just not good enough. Healing most of the time doesn't really matter, what you want is cheap and efficient removal for early game.
No real opinion on Palm Reading; delete Vargoth
Quote From Koetti delete Vargoth
This. Or, find a way to move him into a class so he's not gone completely, but priest can't continue to abuse him.
Here is a series of choices that could be believable (even if it's exceedingly unlikely):
Job done. Now, about Raza...
Quote From AngryShuckie
- Then move Kalecgos from RoS to Classic.
- He's an appropriate character at a sensible power level for Classic.
Is he though? Its a must kill card with 12 health, is impactful the same turn you play him, and is miles ahead of Archmage Antonidas. Also, team5 would have the additional burden of having to design spells around this guy in every expansion, so I wouldn't want him permanently in standard.
Quote From dapperdog Quote From AngryShuckie
- Then move Kalecgos from RoS to Classic.
- He's an appropriate character at a sensible power level for Classic.
Is he though? Its a must kill card with 12 health, is impactful the same turn you play him, and is miles ahead of Archmage Antonidas. Also, team5 would have the additional burden of having to design spells around this guy in every expansion, so I wouldn't want him permanently in standard.
Why would they need to design spells around him? You cannot cheat any spells out early because you have to wait 'til turn 10 to play him, and on that turn you can only cast 1 spell. As far as 10 mana cards go, his immediate impact is pretty tame. The only thing they'd have to avoid printing is a minion (not even a spell) that pulls him out of your hand/deck, but that's a tiny bit of design space that is very easily avoided.
And while killing a 12 health minion on turn 10 may be non-trivial, you still have all the mana crystals you could ever need, so it's not like having to deal with a 12 health minion on one of the early turns. It is no bigger a problem than trying to remove Ysera or Malygos, and they cost 9 mana.
Kalecgos' usage over his time in Standard (which, keep in mind, started off the back of the low-power Year of the Raven) has been pretty much exactly what you'd want of a Classic legendary: present, but usually left out of decks. That was even with dragon synergies being relevant in mage!
Quote From AngryShuckie Show SpoilerQuote From dapperdog Quote From AngryShuckie
- Then move Kalecgos from RoS to Classic.
- He's an appropriate character at a sensible power level for Classic.
Is he though? Its a must kill card with 12 health, is impactful the same turn you play him, and is miles ahead of Archmage Antonidas. Also, team5 would have the additional burden of having to design spells around this guy in every expansion, so I wouldn't want him permanently in standard.
Why would they need to design spells around him? You cannot cheat any spells out early because you have to wait 'til turn 10 to play him, and on that turn you can only cast 1 spell. As far as 10 mana cards go, his immediate impact is pretty tame. The only thing they'd have to avoid printing is a minion (not even a spell) that pulls him out of your hand/deck, but that's a tiny bit of design space that is very easily avoided.
And while killing a 12 health minion on turn 10 may be non-trivial, you still have all the mana crystals you could ever need, so it's not like having to deal with a 12 health minion on one of the early turns. It is no bigger a problem than trying to remove Ysera or Malygos, and they cost 9 mana.
Kalecgos' usage over his time in Standard (which, keep in mind, started off the back of the low-power Year of the Raven) has been pretty much exactly what you'd want of a Classic legendary: present, but usually left out of decks. That was even with dragon synergies being relevant in mage!
He's been in highlander mage pretty much since Uldum, and its pretty hard to say he's not one of the winners of that deck. All its needed is for the meta to slow down slightly and he wouldn't be too far from being an auto include. Any midrange deck can easily fit this in.
Your point in the design aspect, I can sort of understand. It is after all a 10 cost card. But I still think he's not something I'd like to see in evergreen. Blizzard, frost nova, and flamestrike are already very powerful swings cards on their own with kalecgos, and I'd hate to see more cards introduced making this a consistent feature.
I doubt team5 would be removing Archmage Antonidas anyway. In the right deck, he's still a very powerful card, and I think he still fits your criteria for a classic legendary. You dont need apprentice to make this card good, its already a decent card with frost nova.
Quote From dapperdog Quote From AngryShuckie Show SpoilerQuote From dapperdog Quote From AngryShuckie
- Then move Kalecgos from RoS to Classic.
- He's an appropriate character at a sensible power level for Classic.
Is he though? Its a must kill card with 12 health, is impactful the same turn you play him, and is miles ahead of Archmage Antonidas. Also, team5 would have the additional burden of having to design spells around this guy in every expansion, so I wouldn't want him permanently in standard.
Why would they need to design spells around him? You cannot cheat any spells out early because you have to wait 'til turn 10 to play him, and on that turn you can only cast 1 spell. As far as 10 mana cards go, his immediate impact is pretty tame. The only thing they'd have to avoid printing is a minion (not even a spell) that pulls him out of your hand/deck, but that's a tiny bit of design space that is very easily avoided.
And while killing a 12 health minion on turn 10 may be non-trivial, you still have all the mana crystals you could ever need, so it's not like having to deal with a 12 health minion on one of the early turns. It is no bigger a problem than trying to remove Ysera or Malygos, and they cost 9 mana.
Kalecgos' usage over his time in Standard (which, keep in mind, started off the back of the low-power Year of the Raven) has been pretty much exactly what you'd want of a Classic legendary: present, but usually left out of decks. That was even with dragon synergies being relevant in mage!
He's been in highlander mage pretty much since Uldum, and its pretty hard to say he's not one of the winners of that deck. All its needed is for the meta to slow down slightly and he wouldn't be too far from being an auto include. Any midrange deck can easily fit this in.
Your point in the design aspect, I can sort of understand. It is after all a 10 cost card. But I still think he's not something I'd like to see in evergreen. Blizzard, frost nova, and flamestrike are already very powerful swings cards on their own with kalecgos, and I'd hate to see more cards introduced making this a consistent feature.
I doubt team5 would be removing Archmage Antonidas anyway. In the right deck, he's still a very powerful card, and I think he still fits your criteria for a classic legendary. You dont need apprentice to make this card good, its already a decent card with frost nova.
Well I haven't seen a mage play him in ages. I actually don't remember when it last happened, it was so long ago. Perhaps I have just been beating highlander mages before they can play him? That seems a bit unlikely as I prefer my games to go beyond turn 10. Regardless, I'll take your word for it that he is played more than I have seen him.
Certainly the dominance of aggro this year has made it tougher to play him, but isn't that more evidence that he is fine? A turn 10 high-ish tempo turn (which is pretty piddly compared to what many classes can do) is always going to be limited by the fact you have to wait 'til turn 10 to do it. I guess it's a similar story for Antonidas + Frost Nova: there's enough removal in Standard at all times that taking turn 10 to threaten something next turn if a minion survives is just not a big problem.
For the record, I'm fine with saying Antonidas is good without the Apprentice, but that 'good' is historically not good enough to have any meta significance. The only time I remember him being used in the meta outside of an Exodia deck was to turn spare parts into extra reach in mech mage.
Anyway, let's shelve this discussion lest we accidentally turn a priest thread into a mage one.
Quote From Maurice Priest is completely broken in Wild. Here some suggestions how to balance it.
Wave of Apathy -> 2 mana
Mass Hysteria -> 6 mana
Psychic Scream -> 8 mana
Palm Reading -> 4 mana
Archmage Vargoth -> 5 mana
Raise Dead -> 1 mana
Spirit Lash -> 3 mana
And no I don`t vote for one of these nerfs, I vote for ALL of them.
PS: Over 40% of my meta at rank diamond 5 is Priest.
Youre even worse at nerfs then blizzard and thats saying alot
I agree with most suggestions.
If they actually nerfed Palm Reading, I'd even be ok with keeping board clears as they are now.
The card can easily be compared with Wild Growth - except Priest is not already overnerfed because they don't normally have ramp.
Priest may have a billion answers to boards, but wild barely cares anyway since there's just so many ways of reloading or killing players without boards. When raza was nerfed, hardly anyone had problems with the class, except the usual big priest issues, which can be countered, and it was never going to beat mage in the first place.
Perhaps consider playing Zul'Drak Ritualist instead if big priest is a constant threat. If its raza priest that's the problem, then I sympathize because the only true counter takes 2 cards to do. But the nerfs you suggested will be more impactful to standard, where priest is really just a dumpster class, and that's a real non starter in my opinion
Why is Raza not on your list?
Looking at it long-term, the only real way to fix big priest is to add some proper graveyard mechanic to the game. Which, in all fairness, will likely never happen.
The resurrect mechanic is just too easy to exploit and big priest has become this cockroach of an archetype that'll just pop up out of nowhere whenever it gets support. Ready to do the exact same thing it's been doing for the past however many years now. Whether you nerf a few of its cards or not.
Also, your suggestion will kill any and all forms of competitive viability Anduin has, and will ever have. The literal only upside to your proposal is that Rexxar will finally have a friend all the way down at wild's dumpster tier.
In my personal opinion Priest is fine with the exception of the Rez archetype. The underlying problem here is that HS does not really has a proper graveyard mechanic like Magic for example and lacks proper counter cards. At its present state most Rez cards are simply mana cheating tools with little counter opportunities. Just take Resurrect, which basically is 2 mana summon a huge minion, or [Hearthstone Card (Mass Resurrection/card] which is basically the same at a higher level. Combine this with all the stalling and copy cards and you have a quite annoying archetype.
That said I don't think any balancing will happen in wild.
) Not Found]I'd say just nerf Shadowreaper Anduin. His Hero Power and Spawn of Shadows are what break Reno Priest. Raza is fine, because a free Hero Power is not as big of an upside, it's just Priest DK is WAY too good to have it's Cost permanently reduced. Without DK or Spawn being this absurd, Reno Priest becomes just another grindy control deck that is possible to create in Wild.
But then you are still left with Darkglare Warlock and Secret Mage, so if Reno Priest was to get sinked, so would prematurely be the other decks.
Quote From Neoguli I'd say just nerf Shadowreaper Anduin. His Hero Power and Spawn of Shadows are what break Reno Priest. Raza is fine, because a free Hero Power is not as big of an upside, it's just Priest DK is WAY too good to have it's Cost permanently reduced. Without DK or Spawn being this absurd, Reno Priest becomes just another grindy control deck that is possible to create in Wild.
But then you are still left with Darkglare Warlock and Secret Mage, so if Reno Priest was to get sinked, so would prematurely be the other decks.
^this!
I keep seeing people complaining about Raza but a 0-cost hero power really is only broken when you can repeatedly use it during a turn. Would love to play wild highlander galakrond priest or wild highlander obelisk priest without it just being a worse version of shadowreaper priest :/
I prefer to just delete the class.
Showerthought: What about making Raise Dead deal 5 damage to your hero? 3 damage is a joke for Priest and Warlock has the Soul Fragment mechanic as well as Man'ari Mosher.
Quote From anchorm4n Showerthought: What about making Raise Dead deal 5 damage to your hero? 3 damage is a joke for Priest and Warlock has the Soul Fragment mechanic as well as Man'ari Mosher.
IF talkign abotu wil soul fragments or manari mosher arent used liek at all.
Warlocks healign is reno , occasiaon healbot or lfiestela from spellstone/ancklebiter,armor of some kazzakus pots and izperhys. Not any fragments or manari.
I was talking about the Warlock lists in Standard. Raise Dead will be around for some time and if my suggestion for a nerf was implemented, Warlock needs tools to compensate the increased damage. Wild is another thing, but maybe 2 more damage could help to keep Darkglare Warlock in check.
Quote From anchorm4n I was talking about the Warlock lists in Standard. Raise Dead will be around for some time and if my suggestion for a nerf was implemented, Warlock needs tools to compensate the increased damage. Wild is another thing, but maybe 2 more damage could help to keep Darkglare Warlock in check.
That'll do quite the opposite as it'll make them have their Molten giants come out even faster.
Not a fan.
True, thanks for the explanation.
Leave a Comment