GoddammitDontShootMe
LV.16COMMENT_COUNT_1900_HS
Comments
2,070 totalCan't really complain about a 0-mana spell. And this is a class that can generate tons of value by casting spells repeatedly.
Doesn't sound super great. It could be a spell of any cost, so you might not even be able to play it for several turns. You should be able to get 2 spells from it with [card]Shadowstep[/card]. If we still …
5 mana, and does nothing when it's played? I'm not having a lot of hope for this card. I guess it might be good with [card]Animated Broomstick[/card], or all the ways warrior has to damage their own minions. Can't say …
1 mana 1/3 is good. If played early, it will almost certainly survive a hit, then you have a 1 mana 3/4 in your deck somewhere. If you're lucky, maybe you'll shuffle in a 1 mana 5/5.
We don't know how many Holy spells there will be, but it looks at least decent. Maybe it won't be great for another expansion or 2. That happens with new cards sometimes.
Nice. It can hit something for 7 damage, and as long as that something doesn't have 6 or more attack, it will transform into a taunt minion and get all its health back +1.
If it had those cost and stats and Spell Damage +3, it would be OP as fuck. Since it's limited to only affecting a subset of spells, maybe it will just be good. Right now the only Nature spell we …
Seems like an aggro card. Could be good in decks that cycle through the deck quickly, otherwise the game might be over before you even find Mankrik's Wife.
I like this upgrading mechanic. If you draw in the mid or late game, you might still kill something. And if not, it's 2 mana.
How good this is will depend on how easy it is to buff it before you proc the Frenzy effect.
This could be nice. Want to get rid of a big taunt? Done. Want to replay a strong battlecry? Done. Just hope you don't pull some 10-mana minion from the enemy's hand on turn 5.
I guess this means they weren't able to get the new game mode from the Year of the Phoenix phase 3 ready as soon as they originally planned.
Expansion 2: Clearly Alliance based.
Expansion 3: Shadowlands?
Is that something in the works? I think it would be nice to have.
I'm certain it wasn't in the list of cards that got moved to the Hall of Fame when I asked this. It's still not in the list of cards that got the Elemental tag later. Neither is Molten Giant.
What about [card]Mountain Giant[/card]?
It said the achievements are based on winning games, not doing weird tasks that require shitty decks, so I'd guess that if, for example, a golden card is unlocked for winning 50 games as Mage, you will also get the …
I really didn't expect an announcement this big before Blizzconline. Some thoughts:
- Classic Format: WoW Classic but for Hearthstone. I didn't know there was a demand for this. Sounds cool though.
- Baku & Genn returning to …
Maybe it get's overwhelming for some people or something, but I think if I'm unable to complete some achievements in the current expansion cycle, I'd like to still be able to get XP for the next cycle to make up …
I wonder if they would make another currency for portraits. Possibly one that you can get only by DEing other portraits or spending real world money. If they do use the same arcane dust, I'm guessing a portrait will cost …
Normally they announced the final expansion of the year at Blizzcon, but they couldn't because it isn't being held in November this time. I think it's a bit early to announce the April expansion, but I think it's a given …