KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I imagine that if you got them initially through the achievement then you won't be able to get them again. But if you got them through crafting then you will be able to get them again through the achievement.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I don't like the idea of guilds since it complicates the game a lot. I like how casual Hearthstone is and I don't think adding a whole new layer to the game would be worth it.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I tried looking at the letter after each pair and got "imaiesenei" which doesn't look or sound like anything. Then I tried taking the letter before each card and got "uldisgsa" which also doesn't seem to mean anything.
The main thing that's stumping me is how the riddle works either with or without Xarl, and what exactly was the "Z" supposed to mean?
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
The way I understand it, the letters given in the code can be changed to spell the name of a card. And the key to deciphering the code can be found in the cards below.
My initial guess was to count how many times a letter from the code appears in the cards and then go that many spaces down the line. (For example, "G" appears five times in the cards below, and "S" is the fifth card in the code, so that would be the first letter in the card's name). But that doesn't work since "A" appears thirty four times, and "Z" appears zero times.
You said that you didn't put the cards in any particular order, but then you implied that the order of the cards does matter. Which leads me to believe we can use the code to sort the cards in some way revealing the answer, but then again we run into the problem of there being no "Z".
You then said that by adding Xarl to the list you could change the "Z" to an "X". Since "X" is the first letter in the cards name, I get the impression that we could use the card's name to figure the code out, but then again we run into the no "Z" problem.
However, by adding Xarl you replaced the "Z" with an "X" which makes things more confusing since it implies that certain cards can remove as well as add letters to the code. But if adding Xarl and changing the "X" with a "Z" leaves the answer the same, then the "Z" without Xarl works the same as the "X" with Xarl. But I can't think of any way in which "Z" relates to these cards.
All that being said, I think the answer is probably Murloc Tinyfin
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I don't mean to nitpick and I understand there are number of perfectly valid reasons for why this might happen, but PLEASE at least put in some kind of effort to avoid having this many typos. One or two typos here or there is fine, having improper punctuation or capitalization is fine, but when every other word has the letters switched around it makes your post difficult to read and it also makes people take you less seriously.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I definitely think there are some older heroes that could be removed to make room for the newer ones. I wish they would rotate the heroes more often to maintain variety but also reduce some of the randomness.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 10 months ago
I agree that toxic people have always existed before the internet, but the internet has definitely created more entitled and opinionated people. When you have a convenient platform where you can voice your opinions and be heard by thousands of people worldwide, it is a lot easier to get it in your head that your opinion matters more. And similarly, when it becomes easier to listen to other peoples opinions, it becomes easier to get triggered by them.
The internet may not inherently create more toxic people, but it makes it a lot easier for people to become toxic. That's how I see it at least.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 11 months ago
The deck is definitely powerful. I have had an abysmal win rate this past season, but so far I have a 100% winrate with this deck. It is probably the most consistent OTK I have ever seen needing only 3 cards and 7 mana. It may be even more consistent then the old Star Aligner Druid.
They will probably either nerf Wretched Tiller to change the trigger or effect slightly so that he doesn't deal 2 damage to the enemy hero on every attack. Or they will change Hysteria to only attack a set number of times.
Hysteria seems like the cleanest and easiest change, but they may change the Tiller just to keep the new cards unchanged.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 11 months ago
Mathematically, it is worth buying the bundle. Even if you don't like the cards, you can disenchant them and end up with more dust than if you had bought packs.
KANSASOld God Fanatic 17452912 PostsJoined 03/25/2019
Posted 3 years, 11 months ago
I missed last competition, hopefully I can be on-time and submit my card this week.
This is meant to be a tribute to the ever present boss card, Looming Presence. If you go full-warlock then you get to use cards reserved for the most sinister boss monsters.
I am not sure if the reference is clear enough or good enough, this is just the first idea I had.
I imagine that if you got them initially through the achievement then you won't be able to get them again. But if you got them through crafting then you will be able to get them again through the achievement.
I don't like the idea of guilds since it complicates the game a lot. I like how casual Hearthstone is and I don't think adding a whole new layer to the game would be worth it.
I tried looking at the letter after each pair and got "imaiesenei" which doesn't look or sound like anything. Then I tried taking the letter before each card and got "uldisgsa" which also doesn't seem to mean anything.
The main thing that's stumping me is how the riddle works either with or without Xarl, and what exactly was the "Z" supposed to mean?
The way I understand it, the letters given in the code can be changed to spell the name of a card. And the key to deciphering the code can be found in the cards below.
My initial guess was to count how many times a letter from the code appears in the cards and then go that many spaces down the line. (For example, "G" appears five times in the cards below, and "S" is the fifth card in the code, so that would be the first letter in the card's name). But that doesn't work since "A" appears thirty four times, and "Z" appears zero times.
You said that you didn't put the cards in any particular order, but then you implied that the order of the cards does matter. Which leads me to believe we can use the code to sort the cards in some way revealing the answer, but then again we run into the problem of there being no "Z".
You then said that by adding Xarl to the list you could change the "Z" to an "X". Since "X" is the first letter in the cards name, I get the impression that we could use the card's name to figure the code out, but then again we run into the no "Z" problem.
However, by adding Xarl you replaced the "Z" with an "X" which makes things more confusing since it implies that certain cards can remove as well as add letters to the code. But if adding Xarl and changing the "X" with a "Z" leaves the answer the same, then the "Z" without Xarl works the same as the "X" with Xarl. But I can't think of any way in which "Z" relates to these cards.
All that being said, I think the answer is probably Murloc Tinyfin
I don't mean to nitpick and I understand there are number of perfectly valid reasons for why this might happen, but PLEASE at least put in some kind of effort to avoid having this many typos. One or two typos here or there is fine, having improper punctuation or capitalization is fine, but when every other word has the letters switched around it makes your post difficult to read and it also makes people take you less seriously.
I would love this. More community engagement is always a good thing.
We definitely don't need every deck spotlight to be a community deck, but it would be cool to feature those more.
I actually thought about this exact post when that deck became a thing. Weird . . .
I definitely think there are some older heroes that could be removed to make room for the newer ones. I wish they would rotate the heroes more often to maintain variety but also reduce some of the randomness.
I started an arena and duels run, and just now I got a refund for my arena run, but my duels run is still going.
Pezman and Alleria standing there drowning in snow just like
I agree that toxic people have always existed before the internet, but the internet has definitely created more entitled and opinionated people. When you have a convenient platform where you can voice your opinions and be heard by thousands of people worldwide, it is a lot easier to get it in your head that your opinion matters more. And similarly, when it becomes easier to listen to other peoples opinions, it becomes easier to get triggered by them.
The internet may not inherently create more toxic people, but it makes it a lot easier for people to become toxic. That's how I see it at least.
The deck is definitely powerful. I have had an abysmal win rate this past season, but so far I have a 100% winrate with this deck. It is probably the most consistent OTK I have ever seen needing only 3 cards and 7 mana. It may be even more consistent then the old Star Aligner Druid.
They will probably either nerf Wretched Tiller to change the trigger or effect slightly so that he doesn't deal 2 damage to the enemy hero on every attack. Or they will change Hysteria to only attack a set number of times.
Hysteria seems like the cleanest and easiest change, but they may change the Tiller just to keep the new cards unchanged.
That's the 15 dollar bundle, it might be available for gold for longer than that.
Mathematically, it is worth buying the bundle. Even if you don't like the cards, you can disenchant them and end up with more dust than if you had bought packs.
May I request a warlock deck spotlight? I have been looking for a good zoo list but haven't found anything that works.
I am very glad the dev team is interacting more with the player base.
Contrary to the sentiments of the general public, I think hearthstone is in a great spot and will only get better from here on out.
Please.
Just nerf Highlander Priest in wild already.
Happy new years everyone!
I missed last competition, hopefully I can be on-time and submit my card this week.
This is meant to be a tribute to the ever present boss card, Looming Presence. If you go full-warlock then you get to use cards reserved for the most sinister boss monsters.
I am not sure if the reference is clear enough or good enough, this is just the first idea I had.