It is indeed a dessert, not a desert. Think of a really unpopular type of baked dessert.

Demonxz95, I kind of like it. Invoking twice for 3 mana seems pretty powerful. Making this way more efficient than the cost would imply both in terms of immediate value, and in long term value with galakrond. I would change the Reborn to Echo. Then you have 6 mana to invoke twice and get a piar of 2/1s with rush, similar to [Hearthstone Card (Corrupt Elementailist) Not Found] but instead of a 3/3 you get minions in your hand.

linkblade91, I think the Spellburst effect is a bit extreme given how easy it is to shuffle 4+ Soul Fragments, and how much healing that would get you. Not to mention the fact that you could do it twice with a second copy of the card.

Wailor, I really like it, It is slightly sub-par when played alone, moderate when you play 2, and it can create a powerful board when you play all 3. I might reduce the cost to 2 mana, but that may be a bit too little.

BloodMefist, I don't think it needs Corrupt, but without it it doesn't fit the prompt. I would reduce the cost by 1 or increase the damage by 1 to justify having an extra clause on the card. Doctor Magnetron seems, for lack of a better word, unnecessary. For just 5 mana you can summon a copy of anything you want, this is 4 mana with extra steps and restrictions to summon a copy of something with a slight buff, and this is 1 rarity higher.

DestroyerR, I like the flavor, but in practice I don't think she is likely to survive more than a single round. This is the problem with most inspire cards, you can only trigger it once per turn and using your hero power can be expensive. I would give it 4/5 stars.

anchorm4n, Very nice flavor, and you did a very good job of weaving the abilities together to make them all work together well. I give you 5 stars, probably my favorite card so far. I like Zevrad, Big Demon Hunter is something that has gotten a few cards, but has never really worked. Getting a strong pro-active rush minion + a big demon will be very useful for the deck. I don't really have anything to criticize.

Hordaki, Kobold Schemer is an interesting design, but it will be tricky to get more than 1 scheme off of it, and spending 4 mana just to get a random card seems very bad. Especially since schemes aren't really going to be worth much until a few turns later. Pupil of the Moon is a very solid card (no pun intended). It is balanced, strong, and looks like a fun card to play.

ChickyChick, I think spare part and lackey are good for set-specific keywords. Though the razorpetal seems kind of irrelevant. I would make it 1 mana and remove the razorpetal.

DavnanKillder, I like Sandy Shark since it is pretty simple and straight-forward, while also having a very strong design. I am not a big fan of Enchanted Gun since it just a cheaper Arcanite Reaper with an extra Overkill ability. And the pistol seems out of place for Hearthstone. M.U.R.L.O.C. Prototype is not a bad card, but I think Sandy Shark is better in just about every way, design-wise.

 

FieselFitz, The wording should say "Battlecry: If you control a Secret, summon a copy of this for each player." That aside, the card is pretty weak. Compare it to [Hearthstone Card (Griffin Trainer) Not Found], even though you get more stats, the card is still bad since your opponent gets to attack with the minion first. Also compare it to Occult Conjurer, it costs 1 more, has +1/+1, but also gives your opponent a 5/5. So really, triggering the ability on this card is a negative.

anchorm4n, I like the second version better. Maybe it could be 4 mana with slightly higher stats, but I think it is mostly fine as it is.

Demonxz95, I like it. It is flexible, useful, balanced, bounce-able, everything that makes a good rogue card. Good job.

BloodMefist, Overall I think it is balanced. At it's base it is fairly weak, but when buffed is better than Mysterious Challenger. The payoff is worth the effort you would put into buffing it, and it doesn't feel terrible playing it when it only has 1 attack. Well done.

Wailor, I think you could submit Ghost of Winterveil Past as a priest card and have a very good shot of winning. The flavor of the card is so strong, it doesn't even matter if it is just a glorified Spellslinger. I would give it 5 stars right now.

DavnanKillder, I am still not a fan of Nixue since it can basically just grind the game to a halt and straight up stop your opponent from playing. Disguised Saboteur is more interactive and less frustrating.

Hordaki, I like it. It seems balanced, and the flavor is pretty good. I don't have any criticisms. 

Linkblade91, I like it. I like the idea of a secret mage, but having to face two copies of Fireball, Forgotten Torch, Roaring Torch, and [Hearthstone Card (cloudprince) Not Found] in one game gets pretty annoying. I like having it support a slower, more defensive build. I think it is balanced at it's current cost, and I think it would be a useful tool for any slower mage deck, without being terribly OP. The only thing that bugs me is that the pillar can freeze itself. You may have done that deliberately due to balance, but flavor-wise I don't think it makes sense, and also it defeats the purpose of the card. I play this to freeze their minions, not to freeze the 0/6 pillar I gave them.

Wailor, I am torn between loving and hating this card. On one hand, it is really hard to use and the payoff is negligible (you could just play Al'Akir the Windlord, which is just as easy to cheat out but deals more damage). But on the other hand, it feels like a genuine freeze shaman card. And part of me likes it more due to the general silliness and dumbness of the card. Personally, I would give it 5 stars, but I wouldn't count on other people rating it very high.

Demonxz95, I feel the same way about your card now as I did before. It is a cool card, but since you have to freeze a minion and then play this in the same turn, it feels kind of clunky to use. 

Bloodmefist, First off I think the correct wording would be "Battlecry: Cast a number of random Secrets equal to this minions attack". I don't really like the idea of this card being neutral, since it shouldn't be that easy for non-secret classes to get secrets. I would put it in either Hunter or Paladin since both of those classes have handbuff and Secrets. I would probably pick paladin since most of Hunters handbuff stuff is beast related.

FenrirWulf, Your card is too wordy. I get why you'd do it, but it is unnecessarily complicated to pick a friendly minion, and then freeze enemy minions opposite it. Just have it freeze a target enemy minion. I like the back-and-forth of the original version, but it it is very wordy. I would either have it say "Freeze an enemy minion, give this to your opponent" and then just have it last forever. Or have it say "Freeze an enemy minion, give this to your opponent (5 Snowballs left!)" and then have it stop after 5 times. The version on the right is well balanced, but too similar to Frost Nova.

anchorm4n, Balance-wise, I think it is fine. It is exactly the type of wide-board effect hunters would get. But flavor-wise I think your card is lacking. Having a "Christmas tree" in hearthstone means having 5 secrets, so it would make sense for your literal Christmas tree card to benefit from having 5 secrets. It also doesn't make a whole lot of sense flavor-wise for a Christmas tree to deal damage.

DestroyerR, First off, you did a great job with the Grinch reference. Not just in name and art, but also in the ability. In terms of balance and play, I think the card could use some tweaking. I am guessing the idea is that you will want to kill him before he gives the cards back, and the opponent wants him alive so they don't have to lose cards. But at a 6 mana 4/5 it feels a little awkward. I would give him more health to make him harder for your opponent to kill, and I would also put him in a class so that warlocks don't get more mill potential on top of Tickatus and Gnomeferatu. Also, I am pretty sure it fits the competition since all it says is it has to give your opponent cards. It doesn't say where they had to come from, or what had to happen to them first.

DavnanKillder, Disguised Saboteur: I would put this in warlock. I get why you put it in rogue, but switching sides, dealing damage to your face, and having those "curse" type effects that mess with your opponent (i.e. Curse of Rafaam, Chaos Gazer, Gnomeferatu etc) are all things warlock does. About balance, I think the 2/5 statline is good, but 4 mana seems like a lot. All this card does for you is damage your opponents face. Spending 4 mana and giving them a minion just to deal some face damage isn't usually a good move. And it is made worse by the fact that your opponent gets some agency in whether or not they trigger the ability. I would change it to 3 mana, or maybe make it a 2 mana 1/4.                                         Nixue, The Awake Winter: First off you should change the wording to just say "Frozen characters don't unfreeze." Second, I would change the name to something like "Awakened Winter" or "Spirit of Winter". It isn't a big deal but right now the name doesn't flow very well, at least to me. About the actual ability, it is very hard to balance because you could potentially have their whole board frozen, in which case if they don't have a removal spell they are stuck for the entire game. On the other hand, 4 health is very easy to deal with if your opponent has a removal spell or a rush minion, or if you don't have enough freezes. So all in all I think it would be too much work to get it balanced properly. I think your other card is a lot better.