RavenSunHS

1/4 for all cards including commons and rares would already be a great thing on the long run.

I'm curious but not seriously hyped.

For what is my gamestyle (homebrewing with Tempo/Midrange decks in Wild) the game has been pretty stale for a while, with the meta overwhelmed by a stupidly limited subset of flawed cards - …

Quote From h0lysatan

Quote From RavenSunHS

actually, I don't think there is a reference function at all for any stats balance and keywords: designers just go by custom, their guts, and ultimately statistics...

Nothing is …

Vanilla stats function is actually non-linear, as it works differently for (1), (2) and probably (3) too. It normalizes only from (4) and above.

We should also consider that multple keywords REAL value (their impact) does not stack as …

I can't see any of those cards having any major impact in the current Wild meta, even if unnerfed.

Quote From CableKnight

I'd be fine seeing him HOF'd. He's not broken, but he just isn't fun to play against in my opinion.

That's because he's a finisher.

It's never fun to lose.

He's an auto-include in minion-based Aggro-Tempo decks.

If the meta is Aggro-Tempo oriented, Leeroy becomes popular.

Either way, about sheer popularity, [card]zilliax[/card] is far more obnoxious. In Wild too. Now THAT is a card that is truly everywhere, …

I don't really understand why people want to HoF [card]malygos[/card].

Has Malygos ever been oppressive? It's never been regularly in the meta. At best, it's probably been top tier for short periods of time.

Even if a Malygos …

[card]Lyra the sunshard[/card] for some Miracle Priest, and [card]king mukla[/card] for Mill Rogue.

I actually played both decks and cards for a while, and sometimes they win you games, but they are completely out of place in Wild...

After DoD, i am quite pessimist about the future of HS.

This Pogo brawl is just another brick in the wall (avoidable with minor thought and ban, they didn't even need to test in this case).

Quote From YourPrivateNightmare

you're not really proving a point though.

They can always "fix stuff later". IN fact, that's what they've done in the past even before frequent patches became commonplace.

I remember when Silithid Swarmer …

Quote From KingKrush

Quote From RavenSunHS

As i already said, a fast & frequent patch/fix policy implies their quality check is bound to get worse in time.

They know they can always fix things later, …

Quote From DoubleSummon

Quote From RavenSunHS

As i already said, a fast & frequent patch/fix policy implies their quality check is bound to get worse in time.

They know they can always fix things later, …

Quote From Gilbie

I still downvote you. Because this is just childish behaviour. And your argument still doesn't make sense.

So, pointing out a fact that helps proving a previous point of mine is childish …

As i already said, a fast & frequent patch/fix policy implies their quality check is bound to get worse in time.

They know they can always fix things later, after release why worry too much?

But hey, everyone …

Not ruined the game yet, but it's definitely wrong when a minion-heavy deck can consistently play reactively AND contest the board.

A reactive deck, aka a Control deck, trades board power in order to gain removals.

Now with …

As I said in the forum, this is overall a great job, not least because of flavour!

However, I stand by having a slightly stronger Faol: either 6/9 or (7).

But even more importantly, i'd really love Priest …

A card like [card]plague of flames[/card] should cost something like (4).

(3) would still be OP. (Compare with [card]plague of murlocs[/card], which is OP itself, we haven't noticed yet because current Shaman doesn't have enough sealing lategame power).

…

It was about time!

The Dragon restriction is enough to keep [card]breath of dreams[/card] in check.

They need to add many OP Dragons before you notice a serious problem, and even then, it will be because of the OP Dragons themselves, not just …