YourPrivateNightmare
Lv.19Skeleton
Comments
YES! Finally on curve [card]Dendrologist[/card] is possible. The game is saved.
Now I have a proposition for you:
Biig Beast Druid....but you make the beasts big.
We run all the RR big beast stuff like Stampeding Roar and Oondasta, then we buff a bunch of normally not as impressive beasts (Silverback meta hype) and summon them with those. MAybe even run Sathrovarr to get some additional value.
Aside …
Congratulations to everyone who can get her now. She's definitely worth it and much better than potato nose Lazul and that soyboy Anduin
This is extremely difficult to evaluate.
On one hand, the fact that this is a 0-mana spell is already huge, because it means there is no tempo loss the turn you play it.
obviously a double Keleseth is pretty crazy as well (or quadruple if you wanna go full nuts), but the cost increase is....heavy
I wonder …
i'M too tired to comprehend this, but it looks awesome
Do Bombs count as neutral cards? Because if so this would be a decent tech (if you don't mind nuking the rest of your neutrals as well)
Quote From UVE Meme intensifies.
That expansion have a lot of meme epic cards.
¿Maybe a counter/combo for Hakkar, the Soulflayer?
probably to reduce the overall cost. We have so many good legendaries, having a bunch of really strong epics would drive the cost of the set a bit overboard …
Yet another meme epic.
I wonder if they deliberately made the neutral epics "worse" because all the legendaries are so good and they didn't want to make the essentials too expensive.
so did I. I was just asking what exactly you found disappointing about the card.
well, just armoring your opponent into submission isn't exactly valuable gameplay either.
because you enjoy decks that win just by having more health than the opponent has damage?
ResidentSleeper Warrior actually having to think about a strategy instead of just vomiting removal and ramor...I hope they'll cope with it.
[card]Acidic Swamp Ooze[/card], [card]Bad Luck Albatross[/card], [card]Gluttonous Ooze[/card], [card]Dragon Slayer[/card], [card]Golakka Crawler[/card]
also, 5/5 for 5 is not well statted. that's the bare minimum. 5/6 or 6/5 is the 5-mana vanilla baseline, and even that's being challenged with stuff like [card]Waxadred[/card]
Also I don't need you to change your opinion, because time will prove me right anyways. If …
are you delusional? this is a 5-drop with no synergy that does nothing (or barely anything) against 6 out of 9 classes. Even Skulking Geist wasn't run that often despite JAde Druid being a relevant force in the meta.
Do you still run Harrison Jones in every deck despite there being barely any relevant weapons in the meta?
…
giveaway ends at December 7th, meaning you have more than enough time too think of your 2 cents on every revealed card.
what are you on about? That's like saying printing Skulking Geist killed Jade Druid forever.
You can still play Thekal because not everyone will run this.
The only situation in which Platebreaker will be a common tech card is if there is an armor focussed deck that completely dominates the meta and in that case you just don't …
It will see play if there's a control deck with a limited damage finisher (for example Highlander Mage with Dragoncaller, Alex, Pyro and Fireball) if Warrior (or any class that can get a sizeable stack of armor, we have yet to see most of Druid's cards) becomes popular.
This is good because it finally removes the "this control deck …
Nah.
It just means that Weapons will get better because Warrior is better off using armor as a ressource instead of a shield.
Not to mention noone's going to play this unless Control WArrior is top tier.
but...nobody plays Thekal. This is a counter to armor stacking strategies and nothing else. Nobody's gonna run this on the off chance that some lunatic runs Thekal in his Holy Wrath Paladin
Also, armor is the most overpowered mechanic in the game because it has no cap and previously had no counter, so any lategame deck with …
I like Kripp, I really do.
But you have an expansion called Descent of Dragons and you're not calling Kibler?