Demonxz95

Remember [card]Small-Time Buccaneer[/card]? He used to have 2 Health, and was then nerfed. This is pre-nerf Small-Time Buccaneer that's easier for most decks to activate. It not being a Pirate is a small price to pay. Really good card.

It's certainly amusing, and it's a way for every class to deal 4 damage. That said, I don't imagine it making waves in Constructed.

That face is nightmare material.

The effect is funny, but it's too random for it to be practical for competitive play.

I knew we would see this card someday. It's beautiful. 5 stars! Amazing.

[spoiler text="Serious review"]But in reality, it's not that great. I feel it could've been 3 mana without being broken.[/spoiler]

I'm still waiting for Cleave to become a keyword, and also Elusive for that matter.

This is going to be really good in Arena, but probably not in Constructed where it's too reliant on surviving a turn for it …

It's quite unlikely that it will see play, but 0 mana minions are quite rare in the game, so it's always kinda cool in a weird way to see one. We just need our 0 mana 1/1 Elemental, Totem, Dragon, …

Pretty decent card in any spell based deck, which they've been pushing this set. I'd say it has a pretty decent chance of seeing play.

It's slow to have the Deathrattle occur naturally, although it's really good to cheat out, and it's good for Deathrattle activators where you can quickly get a bunch of 7-Cost minions on the board.

I remember that [card]Anubisath Warbringer[/card] …

Haha, better [card]Wee Spellstopper[/card]. With how much AoE there is, the effect isn't as strong as it could be, although it will still be annoying for your opponent to deal with sometimes. I'm a bit doubtful of it seeing play …

The ability isn't bad. It could be used as a way for any class to Discover a spell, although it's not that good for the Spell Damage since you typically want those to be as cheap as possible unless it's …

Aw, she doesn't eat the books? She's not very voracious then (and that was your shitty joke for the day).

Seems like it would be really strong in super, super face decks that vomit their whole hand no problem …

It can be an [card]Elven Archer[/card] for Mage, a [card]Lost in the Jungle[/card] for Paladin, and... that's actually it. It is a worse [card]Kobold Librarian[/card] in Warlock, although it still isn't bad. It's actually a decent turn 1 play for …

A pretty good Neutral Common, especially in Demon Hunter with their 1 mana Hero Power. Even decks in Wild could use it pretty well too. I reckon we'll see quite a bit of it, especially in DH in Standard.

…

I reckon it'll probably be experimented with in SD Mage or Shaman, and then probably subsequently dropped by most of them. The payoff is pretty good and maybe easier to get off due to the new synergy, which is why …

It gives you two extra minions which could then be buffed by something like [card]Into the Fray[/card] or [card]Armegadillo[/card], which could be decent. That said, it probably won't see that much play.

It's decent as Rush Warrior support. Not as much as [card]Town Crier[/card] which is vaguely similar, although it's not too bad.

That said, in Wild, you'd probably just play [card]Town Crier[/card] instead. In Standard, I'm not sure where this …

(Foe) Reaper's Scythe - You know they did on purpose (and it's fitting since a scythe is a farming tool).

The effect is quite strong though, and you can choose when it'll go off. It even has good synergy …

Remember [card]Dark Possession[/card]? The 1 mana Discover a Demon card with a downside?

This just wipes the floor with that card in every single way. Theoretically, it could be really useful with Jaraxxus since it would allow you to …

The healing potential is insane, although it also seems really slow on 8. Then again, Hagatha had the same AoE damage on 8 mana and that saw play, so maybe this will as well.

This actually seems pretty good since it effectively offers a free trigger of Spell Damage for up to 3 turns (you do pay 2 mana for the weapon on turn one if you choose to use it that turn, but …