GoddammitDontShootMe

I haven't done much Windows development, could a bot not send mouse events to the game while it is in the background? Using the mod to send keyboard events would mean that it wouldn't have to know the precise position …

[quote from="Article"]The mod injects custom code into the game[/quote]

Blizzard is probably going to kill this, and from a security perspective, it makes sense. Hopefully this will push them to add official support that doesn't rely on arbitrary code …

Oh so you're like those people I see sometimes that do nothing and hand me a free win while I'm doing my daily. I prefer to actually play.

I got all my weeklies finished yesterday this week, largely because …

I could barely find time to get all my weeklies done on time some weeks, and I only play on one region. I can only imagine having to do everything twice.

I don't recall where I finished the rewards …

It says the mounts leave a vanilla minion, but doesn't that mean no text, not even keywords?

Were past quests ever discoverable in constructed? I started a bit before the RR launch and I don't recall ever getting a quest from a discover a spell card.

Do these calculations care which order you play cards to complete the steps? While not ideal, if it's turn 3, for example, and you haven't drawn a 2-cost yet, but you have a 3-cost, I think you should be able …

Come to think of it, adding like that is obviously wrong because the probability exceeds 100% within 2 or 3 turns, but in reality they could be the last 4 cards in the deck. I just tried adding because even …

Is this the first time anybody from the team has publicly acknowledged the pity timer? I remember somebody did some analysis using the results of some streamer opening hundreds of packs and I'm pretty sure it did show the probability …

You say 54% chance of seeing one copy of these cards by turn 1, then in the next sentence it's 46%.

I realized I have no clue how to calculate that. I figure going first in the mulligan since …

Reminds me of [card]11384[/card] except it gives Taunt instead of Divine Shield. Should be good somewhere.

Only reason I can see this being Neutral is that they already made 10 cards for Rogue.

Might as well be a Druid/Shaman dual-class card. It probably won't discount a lot, since almost nobody will leave it alive any longer than they have to.

Alright, who wants some slightly discounted mechs? I am genuinely not sure.

Since there are plenty of cases where you don't have a board, tradeable makes this fairly good.

Reminds me [card]11361[/card], even though the only thing this has in common is that it makes copies. Will probably mostly be seen in Hunter decks since I don't think anybody else uses beasts, except Druid sometimes.

I don't think this one will be that good. How likely are you to have 8 cards in hand by turn 4? Especially since you generally need to use your cards in order to win.

There's a lot of 3-cost minions, some of which are probably good without triggering a Battlecry. The pool might be too big for it to be consistent.

Well, this one looks good. It's nice to be able to send it back for another card when there is nothing that needs silencing.

I guess you would trade this when you aren't in a position to take advantage of the spell damage. I guess it's okay, I don't think tradeable can make a card worse.