Recently I have seen paladins picking the Hero Power that turns a minion into a 3/3, rather than the one that makes recruits. Adding a 3 mana 3/3 vanilla minion to your hand isn't very useful since you will often have better things to play. And turning an opponent's minion into a 3/3 lets you trade into it with whatever you want.

I really really hate illucia. Copying my cards is fine, but outright stealing my cards is very frustrating. 

I agree that it requires much more skill to use properly than tickitus, but that doesn't make it any less frustrating to lose to. Dirty rat isn't so bad since it is one random minion taken from your hand rather than whatever your opponent chooses. And you still get to play with that minion since it is on your side of the board instead of the opponent's. 

Having your cards yoinked right out of your hand will always be frustrating regardless of how powerful it is or how much skill is involved in the stealing.

I was playing paladin with Reckoning in play. My opponent plays Tundra Rhino and gives it Immune with Bestial Wrath. He attacks with it and it dies from Reckoning even though it had Immune.

Normally, things with immune can't be targeted, and if you play an AoE they just ignore the damage. But I guess since Reckoning hits a single target, but you aren't the one picking the target, it works differently.

Also, could you destroy an Immune minion with a random effect like Deadly Shot? Or would that work differently?

Made it just in time!

I made it neutral, bumped up the stats slightly, and fixed the wording.

Additional feedback:

anchorm4n:

Linkblade91:

Nirast:

grumpymonk:

Wailor:

shatterstar1998:

Quote From Whodatninja

This probably isn't the thread for this, but I don't think it deserves its own thread so yeah.

I have a lengthy, drawn-out priest mirror with a guy playing that deck with the buffs and the bloodweavers. I wind up winning in the late game. Guy sends a friend request, then says: "Sethekks in bottom 4 (cards). How gay."

*blink* really dude? I mean, really? In 2021? I'm picturing this guy as 46 years old, still wearing his baseball backwards or something - I don't even know how to respond. He unfriends and vanishes before I can even think of a reply.

Some people are just so ridiculous and childish with their salt it is actually quite difficult to be mad at them.

Quote From anchorm4n

This is genius, KANSAS! Thank you so much! 

 

I felt like this version deserved to be epic because 6/6 over two bodies is borderline broken for 2 Mana. What makes me think I can get away with this is that everything above 1 Attack kills the Cub and denies the Frenzy. Just pray your opponent doesn't start with the coin and an Augmerchant or Wound Prey. What do you think? Is it too strong? I could just let it Summon Misha as well, but I don't want to mess up the Momma Bear rescues her cub flavor. Would it be okay to leave the text on the Cub as it is and use Misha as the token? 

If your concerned with it being too powerful you could make it a 3 mana 2/3. Or you could change the cub to a 1/3 and the mama bear to a 3/3 and keep it at 2 mana. This would make it trigger more consistently, but less impactful when it does

Feedback:

Demonxz95:

Wailor:

Linkblade:

cydonianknight:

grumpymonk:

anchorm4n:

Hopefully this week I can actually give feedback and submit my card on time.

Flavor wise he is a wannabe adventurer, but chickens out and runs away when things get scary. I was looking for art with someone cowering behind their shield, but I couldn't find anything. If anyone has any art like that I would love to see it. 

I like hearthstone a lot more. LoR is more generous with it's rewards, but that is about where the appeal ends. I don't like the UI or setup for the menu, collection manager etc. I don't like how many keywords and regions there are. I don't like how fast Riot makes new cards. I don't like the turn/rounds system. And just in general I don't think the game play is fun. A lot of these things are subjective and if you like them that's fine. The main point I am trying to make is that LoR simply isn't for me and I just have more fun playing Hearthstone.

One time in a duels run I was playing mage with the 1 mana hero power. I had Coldarra Drake in my hand and got Felfire Deadeye from Unstable Portal. I could have killed my opponent on turn 6 but I didn't think about the combo and played Felfire Deadeye on turn 4. Then i felt like an idiot. Thankfully I ended up winning that game anyway.

Why does this thread keep getting bumped up?

Here are my views on this subject:

     The world is a complicated place with many dimensions. No single group of people universally "has it better". There will always be ups and downs in each persons life individually regardless of who they are. What those ups and downs look like will vary depending on many factors. No problem like this is ever black and white.

     Concerning representation in the media, obviously we don't want to only see only one group of people all the time. Diversity is important. However, having diversity for no reason other than the ability to say "look at us, we support diversity!" is bad. This is called Tokenism, and it's not the same as actually supporting diversity.

     That being said I think blizzard made a good move here. Something that I think a lot of people missed is that people don't get into this event by passing a test, blizzard decides who is invited and who isn't. If you are in the event it is because blizzard asked you to be, not because you have some kind of qualification. Blizzard picked some people and later realized that they were been biased in who they chose. So they changed their mind and decided to be more fair. 

     I am not talking about feminism as a whole, since as I mentioned that is a highly complicated subject with many layers and many factors to consider. But when it comes to the people blizzard chooses to participate in these events, women do not have equal representation. Saying that women don't have enough representation across all different forms of media is a controversial statement which is both hard to prove and disprove (like I said, there are a lot of layers to this). But just by looking at all of the people blizzard has asked to play in events in the past, it is irrefutable that they don't ask enough women to participate.

Alright, I decided to keep Nautilus since he was my favorite champion in LoR, but I scrapped the original design in favor of something simpler that keeps the same flavor.

This is meant to be used similar to Siamat or Zilliax. It's useful and fits into several different decks, but it's rather tame in terms of how powerful it is.

This was my initial reaction as well. But as Nevin mentioned a few comments above, the people participating in the innvitational aren't there by virtue of skill, they were hand-picked. If, for example, people in the grandmasters were replaced for the sake of being more "inclusive" then I would be upset because blizzard would be turning down qualified people in favor of less qualified just because of their gender/race.

Also note that Regis did give away his spot voluntarily. I don't know about Kripp though since they didn't have a quote from him in the article.

Here are my first 2 ideas, they are pretty much just straight copies from LoR. I will likely come up with something a bit more creative later.

Teemo gives bomb warriors a bigger payoff and more consistent damage later on. Though I am not sure how balanced it is. Nautilus lets you burn your own cards without risk, though I am not sure about the wording.

Being able to see your MMR sounds like a bad idea. If you want to see your progression, you can already to that by using a decktracker to track your winrate, or by just playing ranked and trying to get a higher rank every season. Being able to see your own MMR probably won't cause any issues aside from a small dopamine increase when it goes up by a lot and a small dopamine decrease when it goes down by a lot. But in general I think a lot of players would rather enjoy the game without constantly worrying about making a number as high as possible, and the players who do want to do that can rank up and play legend.

The main issue though is being able to see your opponent's MMR. I think in general the only thing knowing the expected outcome of a game can do is justify your salt when you lose to a matchup you think you should have won.

I agree. One of my favorite things about Hearthstone is how simple it is. No alternate currencies, no guilds, no more than 4 lines of text on a card, and there aren't a billion cosmetics.

Quote From kaladin

Quote From Ticomon

Quote From kaladin

Quote From Marega

Quote From kaladin

The meta is 100% aggro.   Good job blizzard.

control priest is heavily underrated. not the spell version, control with xyrella samuro, cthun, some use yogg. it out heals hunter and almost every deck out there. its almost 100% lose to tickatus warlock but has a fair chance against most decks and just crushes face decks

decklist?  i've lost every game since the meta update, no lie.  its pretty hard to win when opponents consistently draw the absolute nuts and i dont.  does this control priest draw better than absolute garbage every game?

no way you lost every game by drawing bad

i faced about 12 games in a row of opponents drawing or topdecking the best possible play, anywhere from turn 3 to turn 7, depending on when i had to concede. 

Has it ever occurred to you that maybe you are just a bad player and your losses aren't due to literally having the worst luck possible every single turn?

I am genuinely curious as to what one of your games looks like. Do you use a decktracker? If so would you mind sharing a replay of one of your games?

no.