Pezman's Avatar

Pezman

Joined 06/03/2019 Achieve Points 2235 Posts 2285

Pezman's Comments

  • Wow, what a perfectly cromulent card! Can't wait to try it out!

    In reply to Embiggen
  • Has anyone beaten the Plaguelord of Death on Heroic? His combination of healing, minion-killing deathrattles, taunt, and resurrect effects make it seem impossible to get at him. I'd love a suggestion for which hero might actually work, and what type of broken synergy to aim for.

    In reply to HALP!!!!!
  • I think consistency is neat, so 3-mana and +1 spell damage would have enabled matching explorers. However, the Druid one is totally different in both stats and cost. 

    In reply to Bronze Explorer
  • Nice card. A sort of new take on an old mechanic, since it changes with each class. It should not grant Quests, as they have always been removed from such pools, but Sidequests maybe.

    In reply to Cobalt Spellkin
  • Great card, nice all around value. Lackeys have proven to be quite good in a variety of decks, although not so much in Warrior. Maybe this will change that, especially since there is the new Draconic Lackey.

    In reply to EVIL Quartermaster
  • Will be very good for Wild, but not see much play in Standard. I'm glad this exists.

    In reply to Platebreaker
  • Looks very strong. Even just getting one extra swing off it is worthwhile.

  • Too random to be good. Not terrible though. Love to see the Trolden clips where someone makes their own card cost 25.

  • Well, one turn maybe. Not two.

  • Dang, forgot about how Loti would not keep the 5/5 stats. Yeah, you're right there. I still think DW could be useful if you're desperate for a clear. Not exactly an ideal situation and certainly not a good way to clear, though.

    In reply to Bandersmosh
  • Historically, end-of-year expansions always have some really strong cards since they'll be in the standard pool for less time. Look at Kobolds and Gadgetzan, for example. 

    This card is not insanely OP or anything, but should be very good.

    In reply to Cumulo-Maximus
  • Wow, good point. I wasn't thinking about that, since most similar Warlock effects are only on your turn. I think this card has solid power.

    In reply to Zzeraku the Warped
  • I want to play this in wild, along with Weasel Tunneler and Baron Rivendare, and use either Rogue or Hunter for all the extra DR triggers. Just stuff their deck full of useless 1/1's forever. (Mad cackling).

    In reply to Bad Luck Albatross
  • Never saw Inkmaster Solia too much, so hard to say if this will get played. The condition is easier to meet, and the cost is less. Guess we'll see.

    In reply to Dragoncaster
  • Nice card. Thank god Flamewaker is going back to wild.

    In reply to Arcane Breath
  • Not a good card. If you can play this to a board where the eggs will actually hatch, you're clearly ahead. I'm assuming the eggs only summon drakes if they hatch on their own. If they summon them as a deathrattle, this would be great.

    In reply to Nithogg
  • Thanks for compiling, man! I agree with most of your choices. Loti might be better than terrible, and OG Deathwing should be considered situational. Dragonqueen Alexstrasza should be situational too, since you may have dupes in the deck.

    In reply to Bandersmosh
  • Great question. The wording is bad. But I still don't think it implies 2 of the same card.

    In reply to Stowaway
  • Disagree. There is nothing there that indicates 2 of the same card.

    In reply to Stowaway
  • I'm giving this 3/5. I've played a lot of different decks over the years where your goal is to draw certain cards early, and NOT draw certain things until later. It's very strong when it works, but it depends on you drawing the right things in the right order. Prince Keleseth is a dead draw in the late game. Jungle Giants fails when you draw too many of your big guys before completing the quest. This card is similar. I look forward to trying it.

    In reply to Frizz Kindleroost