Think of it as "If I couldn't finish the Quest, I can still combine my Choose one cards." or "Hmm, it's a filler card, so that I can ditch it.". Choose One 🤔
I should adapt to the new circumstances, instead of complaining about them. That's what smart people do after all... I'm going to try to promote discussion on the forum as much as I can while being positive and friendly most of the time. I really don't care about negative votes, they are inevitable, but having some nice conversations with people all around the world is really everything I want here. :)
Meh... Most people out of there are too shy to truly express themselves, especially nowadays, even on the internet. They live in fear of saying what they really think in terror of not being accepted by others, but not me. ;) Although it's not always effective (well, most of the time it's not :P), forcing dialogue is a way to reveal the hidden truth. Of course, you have to pay a lot of attention to people's comments because usually the truth is hidden on their mistakes (and I'm not talking about grammar ones). ;)
But c'mon guys, my latest posts don't have enough downvotes, I want you to... HIT ME!!! XD XD XD
You know what Sherman, while surfing forums on Hearthpwn era and reading your comments, I always thought you are a "honest troll", who likes to make a fun of people's mistakes or bad mouths or trash talks or whatever you call it. I believe that it's not because you want to inflate your ego -as average trolls do that a lot- but because you like to show people's mistakes in a manner of criticism, with a comedian's mind along the way. This is what I should call as "satiric comedy", which I like that in a person. As I quoted your two posts above, I have no doubts that you are in the middle of a fine line, both as a "troll" and as a "comedian", thus being a good guy.
My English might not be that good, but these are my points and I stand firm. I look forward to make me laugh 😄
Aaand there we go with another Tempo-ish Highlander deck. This thing actually convinced myself I will insta-craft Zephrys the Great, and maybe Bazaar Burglary too.
I'm glad to see people coming up nice Highlander decks with rules stated above. However, why don't all of you try non-Highlander ones? Maybe you can establish a new archetype 🤔
Yeah, this situation is not great atm. We are aware of this, it will be handled for the next xpac, we need to figure out how to better display all these things in the deck widget, for now, just bear with us.
I have an idea: Rather than three columns of deck-pages, seen in main page, only have one. On the upper corners, stick left and right arrows to go to wherever we want.
I bet Reno Mage will be the strongest of all with new expansion. Flame Ward and Tortollan Pilgrim looks promising. Maybe Renolock due to potential of Spiritsinger Umbra+Expired Merchant combo to have more Bloodreaver Gul'dan. However, that doesn't mean other 7 classes are bad. I suggest to try other classes, they are more fun to play as Highlander archetypes, I can assure you.
From what I understood within your post and here on your first post, I believe you want to know who gave + or - to assert your rights or stop the manipulations. While it sounds reasonable, I think that not knowing who gave upvotes or downvotes -except site Staff for security/privacy reasons- are better, not because I don't care but because one would speak up by himself/herself assuming that he/she is reasonable like me.
In short, what I am getting at is, trust the site Staff and tell them if there's any problem such as manipulations but not if there's something trivial. I mean, have a look at my comment (voted as -4), yet I didn't report it because...
Think of it as "If I couldn't finish the Quest, I can still combine my Choose one cards." or "Hmm, it's a filler card, so that I can ditch it.". Choose One 🤔
Congrats to all winners.
You can still try Jade Druid with a Plot Twist when new expansion goes live, if you are interested:
You know what Sherman, while surfing forums on Hearthpwn era and reading your comments, I always thought you are a "honest troll", who likes to make a fun of people's mistakes or bad mouths or trash talks or whatever you call it. I believe that it's not because you want to inflate your ego -as average trolls do that a lot- but because you like to show people's mistakes in a manner of criticism, with a comedian's mind along the way. This is what I should call as "satiric comedy", which I like that in a person. As I quoted your two posts above, I have no doubts that you are in the middle of a fine line, both as a "troll" and as a "comedian", thus being a good guy.
My English might not be that good, but these are my points and I stand firm. I look forward to make me laugh 😄
Hmm, interesting. I have a deck that utilizes Thief and Deathrattle archetypes within Highlander Rogue, if anyone is interested:
Worth the idea, worth the dust 😄
I'm glad to see people coming up nice Highlander decks with rules stated above. However, why don't all of you try non-Highlander ones? Maybe you can establish a new archetype 🤔
SO HOT!
I have an idea: Rather than three columns of deck-pages, seen in main page, only have one. On the upper corners, stick left and right arrows to go to wherever we want.
I bet Reno Mage will be the strongest of all with new expansion. Flame Ward and Tortollan Pilgrim looks promising. Maybe Renolock due to potential of Spiritsinger Umbra+Expired Merchant combo to have more Bloodreaver Gul'dan. However, that doesn't mean other 7 classes are bad. I suggest to try other classes, they are more fun to play as Highlander archetypes, I can assure you.
That thumbnail art looks gorgeous :D
Let's try something different with Priest to spice things up a bit.
Is there something I could do it better?
Nope, not at all. Have fun or discuss by all means. Feel free to stay, why feel so sad now :D
Well done. I wonder, though, will we see an app exclusive to OoC where we can store/sync our collection and such?
From what I understood within your post and here on your first post, I believe you want to know who gave + or - to assert your rights or stop the manipulations. While it sounds reasonable, I think that not knowing who gave upvotes or downvotes -except site Staff for security/privacy reasons- are better, not because I don't care but because one would speak up by himself/herself assuming that he/she is reasonable like me.
In short, what I am getting at is, trust the site Staff and tell them if there's any problem such as manipulations but not if there's something trivial. I mean, have a look at my comment (voted as -4), yet I didn't report it because...
I believe this is how OoC Staff acts regarding + and - votes. Maybe I'm wrong but that's how I think. Hope I was clear enough.
Good plot for a good deck. Well done, RavenSun.
Not sure about Zephyrs but Phaoris would be of good use, just like what I mentioned within the guide.
Why not? Go right ahead if you want more early game support.
That would be the reason as to why I won't add him. Your aim with this deck is to counter all meta-decks that will rise and shine.