man, they are nerfing 3 legendaries. I am glad they did this instead of nerfing just commons and rares

if you are trying to counter the meta, you could also run a Dragonslayer, it is not as good as any of the crabs, but if you are looking for more cheap removal she will do.

most people put a deck in their signature, you could also start a thread advertising your deck. other than that you just have to hope to get noticed.

I think the issue with priest is not that it has a good deck, but that those decks are not fun to play against. I feel like priest, by its very nature, is very frustrating to lose to. whenever priest gets a good deck, it is always very annoying.

Quote From ArcanisDF

Quote From MalcolmReynolds

I want to craft dinotamer brann, but I am also missing subject 9 and siamat. most lists I see run those two, do you think the deck will be viable without them? or should I try and save up for a different deck?

If you are a hunter player Subject 9 is a great card and sees play in almost every hunter deck. Siamat is another great card and imo a safe craft for this set. But it will always depend on your dust. If you have the dust, go fot it. The deck is awesome and super fun. But it's super expensive. 

I don't really have the dust to craft those legendaries. I have like 200 and I am waiting until I have enough to craft brann. if I cannot find replacements for siamat and subject 9 then I probably go after a cheaper deck

I want to craft dinotamer brann, but I am also missing subject 9 and siamat. most lists I see run those two, do you think the deck will be viable without them? or should I try and save up for a different deck?

A better nerf to conjurer's calling would be to simply change the way the card works, make it so that if you play a mountain giant for 4 mana, then it is seen as a 4 mana card. this would make the card way more balanced. but the issue is that if team 5 were to do that everyone would complain about how they nerfed the deck but there is no dust refund.

I usually try and avoid spending my money on hearthstone, but even if I was more willing to spending money I probably would not buy this. I always stop buying packs from a set after I open a legendary, so unless I get super lucky I will probably only get 40 dust in most of the packs. the uldum legendary is nice, but not worth 20 bucks.

I have no idea whats going on.

man, that hero power is ridiculous! hunters are able to deal 2 damage for 2. but that is only to face, yours is only to minions, but dealing damage to face is not equal to dealing damage to minions. that is why cards like Mind Blast and Sinister Strike deal so much damage for their mana cost.

I know hero powers are very hard to design (when I made my custom class that was the hardest part). What might be more balanced and thematic is if maybe you had some kind of temporary minion buff, maybe something like "give a friendly minion +1 health" or "give a friendly minion +1 attack this turn only".

The location cards kinda read weird. I think that instead of it saying "10 turns" and then the effect, it would say "for 10 turns, do X". 

The paladin spell, fortitude of niuzao, also reads kinda weird. I thin it would be better if it said "choose a minion, until your next turn that minion can only take 1 damage at a time" instead of "choose a minion, it can only take 1 damage at a time until your next turn"

The hunter minion having stealth and rush is kinda pointless, I get what you are trying to do, but there is almost no circumstances where you would rather keep it stealthed. 

other than that, the expansion looks well themed and mostly balanced. I really like the pandarian theme, and I hope blizzard makes a panda expansion in the future. 

*edit* I just noticed that your lackey is basically just Titanic Lackey but for one more health. you should probably change it to something else just for more variety. maybe something that gives a minion stats, like +1/+1, or +2/+0.

Quote From jacob1487

This is leftover from last year where the win a game with hunter or mage was at 40 gold. 

I just don't get why blizzard decided to change them to be this way, and why they haven't fixed them yet.

I have a quest that reads "win a game with hunter or mage" for 50 gold, then I have another quest that reads "win two games as priest" for 50 gold. This doesn't make any sense. With the second quest I have to win twice as many games, and I get less options for what class I can play, but the gold reward is the same. Does this seem weird to anyone else? And why would blizzard make their quests like this? 

I wish I had this deck, I can already make a shuffle/Fel Lord Betrug/Plot Twist warlock with a slighty above average winrate in casual, so I would really like to have the quest for it.

also some of these lists look fun!

I just fought against the same deck, I would have won if they were not playing mecha'thun. My opponent played 2 earthen scales, so he had twice the armor. it is a pretty nuts comb.

Quote From SamHobbs494

Quote From iWatchUSleep

Quote From SamHobbs494

More playable?

She was already amazing

Amazing how? I don't think a single competitive deck runs her. Neither now nor pre-SoU.

Sometimes personal experience counts more than if some streamer used it in some mad deck

sorry, but I am afraid that one persons experience does not count for much. those streamers are playing decks that thousands of other people are also playing and having success with.

Man, that reward system is brutal. If you win first place four times you are rewarded 3 packs. 

Quote From sinti

Quote From RavenSunHS

Guys, can you please assume i am not a complete n00b? Thank you.

I know how zephrys works. Yet his algorhythm is not as perfect as it should be.

He can't NOT give a tech option against 2 secrets. Giving Eviscerate, Fireball, Swipe is 3 redundant options. How's that perfect?

And i played him twice.

This WAS a whiff, period. This is a "mildly salty thread" but I'm not even really salty, he failed, not me. And it was a silly Casual game, why should i care?

Now, can we please go on with the purpose of the thread? :)

No, he didnt fail. He is simply not coded to provide a secret removal option consistently (or at all?). He sees secrets, but not what kind of secrets, even if you check for them, he will not remember what secrets were eliminated by your actions. The mistake is you thinking he should offer secret removal options, but that is not how he works in regard to secrets specifically, simple as that.

I have played zephrys on several occasions and he offered me a SI:7 Infiltrator, so Zephrys can see secrets, and he can offer you secret removal.

If you has played eviscerate first then he would have seen the lethal and given you SI:7, or some other from of lethal.

the tavern brawl comes out in 6 hours, if they are not here by then, we start rioting.