I can understand the changes. What im confused about is how they pick these cards to be changed. I guess cause they are from bacis/classic sets? Cause there is waaaaaaaaay more suggestive card art out there, some hell of a lot more revealing. For example Silver Hand Regent :o
Exactly this. I always give my opponent the benefit of the doubt and always Greet them at the start of every game. If they start getting Emote Happy I'll squelch.
However, I have to admit to hitting the 'Wow' Button a lot when I'm about to beat a Big Priest. Because Big Priest players deserve it.
Not to defend Big Priest players specifically, but if you think anyone deserves to be BMed, then you deserve it back. There will always be stupid or oppressive decks in the game, be it big priest or something else, just cause ppl are playing those shouldnt make it ok to pick on them. And whoever thinks it is ok, is part of the problem honestly.
They are probably just trying to get on your nerves and have you misplay. Judging by the fact that you are here talking about it, sadly, they succeeded. You either have to auto-squelch everyone or just ignore it. If you start focusing on your opponent emoting, you will enjoy playing the game less eventually and most likely do a mistake or two down the line.
I just noticed database error regarding cards such as Nightmare from Ysera. There's no picture of it, so is it possible to fix it? I hope there's no error regarding uncollectible card pictures. The Lich King and his Death Knight cards would be a good example.
Yes, there are still some tokens and uncollectible cards missing, should be fixed eventually. All the collectible cards should be in tho.
It's also kinda weird that the only class having a viable purely-spells strategy is Hunter, which isn't really a spell-casting class lore/flavorwise.
Its weird, if you look at it only as casting spells, if you look at what the spells represent - shooting arrows, summoning companions, setting traps, tracking - i think it is a lot more plausible :) That being said, i do agree that it wouldnt be my first pick at a class who could/should be able to do that :)
I think power creep largely killed jaraxxus. I hadn't even considered him because I haven't seen one around in *ages*. There's just too many decks that can kill you from 15 hp.
I really wouldn't mind if he was reworked to be more in line with a regular hero card because I really like mistah J, but boy does it feel bad to have you max health capped at 15. If he worked more like Alexstrasza , where you could heal back up to 30 afterwards and retained your armour, he'd be a lot better in 2019 Hearthstone.
It would definitely be good, if you could heal to 30 once you transform to Lord Jaraxxus, but it just wouldnt make sense flavor wise, nor mechanic wise. Also, they just reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally dont want to touch anything about him, they said so many times, so yeah :/
Never played WoW myself, but iv seen threads pop up from time to time where ppl wished for an Uldum expansion for years now, saying that it is one of the most iconic places in WoW and that it has great lore and locations. I would gladly explore that in Hearthstone :)
Doesn‘t seem to greate but the synergy with Ray of Frost pops into mind. It‘s only a two card combo and an 8 mana 9-9 that has to be removed instantly. Could be even bigger with sorcerer apprentice.
I wouldn’t be to surpised to see this as a tech card for mages in specialist format but i wouldn’t bet on or either! The overall synergy with conjurer mage is not that big at
What do you mean 8 mana 9/9? If anything, then 10 mana 9/9, ray of frost does not cost 0. And if you assume Sorc Apprentice on board, then the combo is even worse, since it requires another card and will cost 10 mana total again. I get where ur coming from, but your example, even if it did cost 8 mana total, is not a good one to make this card look useful. Just a big body and a "wasted" card ... in mage? Might as well play Gruul and be better off, but you wont, cause Gruul sucks, this sucks more :/
Kobalds of Catacombs :D You did it again, Blizz! Just rename it at this point :D
Lets keep this discussion in one place ;-)
https://outof.cards/forums/hearthstone/hearthstone-general/779-what-do-you-think-of-the-card-art-changes
I can understand the changes. What im confused about is how they pick these cards to be changed. I guess cause they are from bacis/classic sets? Cause there is waaaaaaaaay more suggestive card art out there, some hell of a lot more revealing. For example Silver Hand Regent :o
We did a quick deploy to get new cards into db etc. ;-) Guess was not quick enough hehe :)
Oh shit, see? I told you i never played it :D Oh well, i hope we get some nice story with Hearthstone then :)
That could be interesting, tho probably too much extra resources spent for them to be worth it.
Not to defend Big Priest players specifically, but if you think anyone deserves to be BMed, then you deserve it back. There will always be stupid or oppressive decks in the game, be it big priest or something else, just cause ppl are playing those shouldnt make it ok to pick on them. And whoever thinks it is ok, is part of the problem honestly.
They are probably just trying to get on your nerves and have you misplay. Judging by the fact that you are here talking about it, sadly, they succeeded. You either have to auto-squelch everyone or just ignore it. If you start focusing on your opponent emoting, you will enjoy playing the game less eventually and most likely do a mistake or two down the line.
ROFL :D Fixed.
Yes, there are still some tokens and uncollectible cards missing, should be fixed eventually. All the collectible cards should be in tho.
Made a note of that, we will have to investigate further what is goin on. Thanks for reporting the issue! ;-)
Yup, i always craft at least one golden legendary per expansion. I just like shinies :)
I said it before, im calling dalaran crash land in the desert ahahaha!
Its weird, if you look at it only as casting spells, if you look at what the spells represent - shooting arrows, summoning companions, setting traps, tracking - i think it is a lot more plausible :) That being said, i do agree that it wouldnt be my first pick at a class who could/should be able to do that :)
No need, like i said, fine for record sake or to get more info from anyone feeling like they have something to add ;-)
It would definitely be good, if you could heal to 30 once you transform to Lord Jaraxxus, but it just wouldnt make sense flavor wise, nor mechanic wise. Also, they just reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally dont want to touch anything about him, they said so many times, so yeah :/
As we've talked on Discord, this issue is already on our radar, but making a thread for record sake or to gather more info is fine by me ;-)
Never played WoW myself, but iv seen threads pop up from time to time where ppl wished for an Uldum expansion for years now, saying that it is one of the most iconic places in WoW and that it has great lore and locations. I would gladly explore that in Hearthstone :)
I dont think we have that implemented for regular users yet, what do you want it it say?
What do you mean 8 mana 9/9? If anything, then 10 mana 9/9, ray of frost does not cost 0. And if you assume Sorc Apprentice on board, then the combo is even worse, since it requires another card and will cost 10 mana total again. I get where ur coming from, but your example, even if it did cost 8 mana total, is not a good one to make this card look useful. Just a big body and a "wasted" card ... in mage? Might as well play Gruul and be better off, but you wont, cause Gruul sucks, this sucks more :/