Wailor

Feedback time

[spoiler text="Longshadow"]Both ideas have some issues. Loreseeker Cho has the problem that it Discovers after you press the End Turn button, which is a bit weird. Professor Jones, on the other hand, is too similar to [card]Arch-thief Rafaam[/card], at least for my taste.[/spoiler]

[spoiler text="linkblade91"]Pretty nice idea, but I'd buff it to a 4/7 statline, since …

Not sure if this would be too dangerous.

I've already submited my card with a 3/5 statline. Thanks to everyone, especially to anchorm4n for the ortography tip (I've been writing Harbringer my whole life, hopefully I'll remember the correct spelling from now on).

Anyways, more feedback.

[spoiler text="Nirast"]I know I already gave you feedback, but I think Exponential Explosion would be cool if you change it …

Still deciding which stat line should I go with my cards. I was thinking about 4/4/4 for the Stitched Monstrosity, to make it more combinable with other cards and make a slight callback to [card]Abomination[/card]. Not sure about the Maelstrom Harbringer (which I'll probably go with), however. 3/5 maybe? 3/6 seems too much.

Anyway, early feedback while I …

First couple of ideas. Not sure if they're balanced, since it's pretty hard to tell with exponential effects.

BTW is Spell Damage still a thing in Shaman? I know they removed [card]Wrath of Air Totem[/card] from the Hero Power, so I'm not sure if the first card is fine in terms of class identity.

Feedback

[spoiler text="BasilAnguis"]I Take Flight. It may be simple, but it's very flavorful.

In any case, both cards could use some improvement in the artwork department (not that they are bad arts, but the style doesn't fit Hearthstone)[/spoiler]

[spoiler text="Fedrion"]Be careful, because the two versions you made later have three lines of text and would be …

Quote From Arkasaur

@Wailor A neat idea, and I'm not too concerned about reusing designs from other sites. I would like to this this card with more warlock flavour - I'm not really sure at the moment why it's a warlock card over say a Mage card that has historical "Time magic" effects - An infinite dragonflight …

Some early feedback.

[spoiler text="Demonxz95"]I like it!

My main issue is that you chose a slightly weird wording to make the text fit in two lines, but most people won't care/notice. I would still rate the card 5 stars besides this.[/spoiler]

[spoiler text="linkblade91"]The effect is alright and the flavor is on point, but the artwork is pretty …

I'm gonna be upfront. I used this card to win a comp with the same prompt in Hearthpwn post split. Not sure if reusing it is alright, but I also doubt I'll be able to come up with something better 😂

It's relatively cheap removal that can be suboptimal in certain scenarios, like against Taunts or Deathrattles that …

Wow, this thread kinda exploded. I wanted to give some feedback yesterday at this time, but only four-ish people posted, so I decided to wait. Now I have a ton of work haha.

But before that, I'll leave here a non-Secret version of Hibernate, that avoids most of the negatives people found about it. Still not sure which …

First batch of cards. Decided to go for flavor on this one.

linkblade91

[spoiler]I like the "may attack again" version, but potentially being able to attack 8 times seems like too much. The "your spells cast twice version" is also nice, but not so original given that [card]Electra Stormsurge[/card] exists.[/spoiler]

Demonxz95

[spoiler]I prefer Stringslayer Riffy, but The Kingslayers are also cool.

The thing I enjoy the most …

I really enjoyed your expansion, even if most references flew over my head.

Spectacular job!

Feeback

linkblade91

[spoiler]Regarding balance, I think I agree with grumpymonk, but that's not hard to fix. My main issue with the card is that it isn't particularly interesting effect or flavor-wise, beyond its slight connection with [card]Galakrond, the Tempest[/card]. Not a bad card, but it doesn't stand out, at least for me.[/spoiler]

grumpymonk

[spoiler]Both cards are …

Quote From R

Prolonged Growth is just pre-nerfed 2-mana [card]Wild Growth[/card] with extra steps. There is no difference, isn't it?

Edit: I write it before the results.

It's more similar to the current version, since you get the usable crystal on turn 4. The difference is when you use the card.

Congrats, MathU! …

Quote From linkblade91

Quote From Wailor

Not sure if this has synergies that make it broken.

Seems pretty neat, although it potentially does a lot more than [card]Elise the Enlightened[/card] does for 1 less mana. Conversely, your deck would now have duplicates, disabling other Highlander cards like [card]Zephrys the Great[/card] and kind of …

She always has an ace under her sleeve... Or the whole deck sometimes.

Not sure if this has synergies that make it broken.

Since Smart Investment was the card almost everybody seemed to prefer, here's a more balanced version. I know I'm very bad at balancing, but that's mostly because I don't play Hearthstone since Uldum (funnily enough, most of the feedback I gave this week regards balance, so take it with a grain of salt).

Feedback

TheHoax91

[spoiler]The …

Grats, anchor. Very well deserved first place.

I'll start by recycling an idea for a previous expansion. It might be a very obvious effect, however.

Edit: Added Smart Investment. Stonks.